linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/panel-edp: Fix typo in kerneldoc comment (appers=>appears)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 31 Aug 2022 08:03:11 -0700
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc:     Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/panel-edp: Fix typo in kerneldoc comment (appers=>appears)

Sam,

On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 4:23 PM Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> Ever since I got the spell-check working in my editor this one has
> been bugging me. Fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> ---
>
>  drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c
> index e6645d6e9b59..07a383dff548 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c
> @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ struct panel_delay {
>          * before the HPD signal is reliable. Ideally this is 0 but some panels,
>          * board designs, or bad pulldown configs can cause a glitch here.
>          *
> -        * NOTE: on some old panel data this number appers to be much too big.
> +        * NOTE: on some old panel data this number appears to be much too big.
>          * Presumably some old panels simply didn't have HPD hooked up and put
>          * the hpd_absent here because this field predates the
>          * hpd_absent. While that works, it's non-ideal.

Maybe you'd be willing to give me an "Ack" for this stupid little
patch so I can land it? ;-)

-Doug