linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] iio: adc: mcp320x: use callbacks for RX conversion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 31 Aug 2022 23:21:46 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com>
Cc:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, kernel <kernel@...s.com>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] iio: adc: mcp320x: use callbacks for RX conversion

On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 5:19 PM Vincent Whitchurch
<vincent.whitchurch@...s.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 02:40:49PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 1:05 PM Vincent Whitchurch
> > <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com> wrote:
> > > Replace the device_index switch with callbacks from the chip_info
> > > structure, so that the latter has all the information needed to handle
> > > the variants.
> >
> > Below are for the further patches, as I see the original code has the
> > same disadvantages.
>
> Right, these comments are in the original code that is either being just
> being moved or that even just happens to be in the context of the diff.
>
> Just to clarify, do you mean by "further patches" that you expect
> patches to fix these comments to be added to this series which adds
> triggered buffer support?

Yes.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko