linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] iio: adc: mcp320x: use callbacks for RX conversion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yw9t55YVm3YfAs5E@axis.com>
Date:   Wed, 31 Aug 2022 16:19:19 +0200
From:   Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
CC:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, kernel <kernel@...s.com>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] iio: adc: mcp320x: use callbacks for RX conversion

On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 02:40:49PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 1:05 PM Vincent Whitchurch
> <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com> wrote:
> > Replace the device_index switch with callbacks from the chip_info
> > structure, so that the latter has all the information needed to handle
> > the variants.
> 
> Below are for the further patches, as I see the original code has the
> same disadvantages.

Right, these comments are in the original code that is either being just
being moved or that even just happens to be in the context of the diff.

Just to clarify, do you mean by "further patches" that you expect
patches to fix these comments to be added to this series which adds
triggered buffer support?