linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MMIO should have more priority then IO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yw/WKo69Re0g3zLl@casper.infradead.org>
Date:   Wed, 31 Aug 2022 22:44:10 +0100
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To:     Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>, Ajay Kaher <akaher@...are.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
        "bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
        "dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Srivatsa Bhat <srivatsab@...are.com>,
        "srivatsa@...il.mit.edu" <srivatsa@...il.mit.edu>,
        Alexey Makhalov <amakhalov@...are.com>,
        Anish Swaminathan <anishs@...are.com>,
        Vasavi Sirnapalli <vsirnapalli@...are.com>,
        "er.ajay.kaher@...il.com" <er.ajay.kaher@...il.com>,
        "conduct@...nel.org" <conduct@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MMIO should have more priority then IO

On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 03:20:57PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> Hi Matthew,
> 
> On 7/8/22 12:43 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 06:35:48PM +0000, Nadav Amit wrote:
> > > On Jul 8, 2022, at 10:55 AM, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > 
> > Just because I don't use your terminology, you think I have
> > "misconceptions"?  Fuck you, you condescending piece of shit.
> > 
> 
> This is clearly unacceptable and violates the Code of Conduct.

In a message I sent to this mailing list on July 8, I used language
which offended some readers.  I would like to apologise for my choice of
words.  I remain committed to fostering a community where disagreements
can be handled respectfully and will do my best to uphold these important
principles in the future.  I would like to thank the Code of Conduct
committee for their diligence in overseeing these matters.