linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MMIO should have more priority then IO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 12 Jul 2022 15:20:57 -0600
From:   Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
Cc:     Ajay Kaher <akaher@...are.com>, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
        "bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
        "dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Srivatsa Bhat <srivatsab@...are.com>,
        "srivatsa@...il.mit.edu" <srivatsa@...il.mit.edu>,
        Alexey Makhalov <amakhalov@...are.com>,
        Anish Swaminathan <anishs@...are.com>,
        Vasavi Sirnapalli <vsirnapalli@...are.com>,
        "er.ajay.kaher@...il.com" <er.ajay.kaher@...il.com>,
        "conduct@...nel.org" <conduct@...nel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MMIO should have more priority then IO

Hi Matthew,

On 7/8/22 12:43 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 06:35:48PM +0000, Nadav Amit wrote:
>> On Jul 8, 2022, at 10:55 AM, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
>>
> 
> Just because I don't use your terminology, you think I have
> "misconceptions"?  Fuck you, you condescending piece of shit.
> 

This is clearly unacceptable and violates the Code of Conduct.

Others including the person this was directed at already called out
the violation:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/85071FE5-E37A-44CF-9EF7-CB80C116A876@vmware.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/all/880aac01-9c78-34f7-8a11-d48179e1635c@redhat.com/

You should be well aware that this type of language and personal attack is a
clear violation of the Linux kernel Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct as
outlined in the following:

https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/code-of-conduct.html

Refer to the Code of Conduct and refrain from violating the Code of Conduct
in the future.

thanks,
-- Shuah (On behalf of the Code of Conduct Committee)