[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yw6pxrS1zb5JKt8q@ziepe.ca>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 21:22:30 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>
Cc: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@...el.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Eric Farman <farman@...ux.ibm.com>,
Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@...ux.ibm.com>,
Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>,
Jason Herne <jjherne@...ux.ibm.com>,
Harald Freudenberger <freude@...ux.ibm.com>,
Diana Craciun <diana.craciun@....nxp.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
Longfang Liu <liulongfang@...wei.com>,
Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...dia.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@...dia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Abhishek Sahu <abhsahu@...dia.com>,
intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/15] vfio/fsl-mc: Use the new device life cycle helpers
On Sun, Aug 28, 2022 at 01:10:32AM +0800, Kevin Tian wrote:
> From: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
>
> Export symbol of vfio_release_device_set() so fsl-mc @init can handle
> the error path cleanly instead of assuming certain vfio core API can
> help release device_set afterwards.
I think you should leave it as is, the "device_set" cleanup is just
something handled completely internally to vfio
If ops->init fails then we expect the core code to clean the
device_set, and it does because it calls vfio_init_device() already.
Having a single weirdly placed release in the driver is pretty
confusing, IMHO.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists