[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <882e9efc-7222-c3af-e37b-f339789e94c0@microchip.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 07:24:08 +0000
From: <Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com>
To: <chenguokai17@...ls.ucas.ac.cn>, <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
<palmer@...belt.com>, <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
<rostedt@...dmis.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<liaochang1@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/riscv: kprobes: implement optprobes
Hey Chen,
FYI there is a build warning with this patch:
arch/riscv/kernel/probes/opt.c:34:27: warning: no previous prototype for 'can_kprobe_direct_exec' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
34 | enum probe_insn __kprobes can_kprobe_direct_exec(kprobe_opcode_t *addr)
Also, if you run scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict, it will have a
few complaints about code style for you too. Other than that, I
have a few comments for you below:
On 31/08/2022 05:10, Chen Guokai wrote:
> [You don't often get email from chenguokai17@...ls.ucas.ac.cn. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> This patch adds jump optimization support for RISC-V.
s/This patch adds/Add
>
> This patch replaces ebreak instructions used by normal kprobes with an
s/This patch replaces/Replace
> auipc+jalr instruction pair, at the aim of suppressing the probe-hit
> overhead.
>
> All known optprobe-capable RISC architectures have been using a single
> jump or branch instructions while this patch chooses not. RISC-V has a
> quite limited jump range (4KB or 2MB) for both its branch and jump
> instructions, which prevent optimizations from supporting probes that
> spread all over the kernel.
>
> Auipc-jalr instruction pair is introduced with a much wider jump range
> (4GB), where auipc loads the upper 12 bits to a free register and jalr
> appends the lower 20 bits to form a 32 bit immediate. Note that returning
> from probe handler requires another free register. As kprobes can appear
> almost anywhere inside the kernel, the free register should be found in a
> generic way, not depending on calling convension or any other regulations.
convention
>
> The algorithm for finding the free register is inspired by the regiter
register
> renaming in modern processors. From the perspective of register renaming, a
> register could be represented as two different registers if two neighbour
> instructions both write to it but no one ever reads. Extending this fact,
> a register is considered to be free if there is no read before its next
> write in the execution flow. We are free to change its value without
> interfering normal execution.
>
> Static analysis shows that 51% instructions of the kernel (default config)
> is capable of being replaced i.e. two free registers can be found at both
> the start and end of replaced instruction pairs while the replaced
> instructions can be directly executed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Guokai <chenguokai17@...ls.ucas.ac.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Liao Chang <liaochang1@...wei.com>
What does Liao have to do with this patch?
> ---
> arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/riscv/include/asm/ftrace.h | 2 +-
> arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h | 28 ++
> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile | 1 +
> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/opt.c | 483 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/opt_trampoline.S | 133 ++++++
> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/simulate-insn.h | 9 +
> 7 files changed, 656 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/probes/opt.c
> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/probes/opt_trampoline.S
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> index d557cc502..a54e50de2 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ config RISCV
> select HAVE_KPROBES if !XIP_KERNEL
> select HAVE_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE if !XIP_KERNEL
> select HAVE_KRETPROBES if !XIP_KERNEL
> + select HAVE_OPTPROBES if !XIP_KERNEL && !CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_C
> select HAVE_MOVE_PMD
> select HAVE_MOVE_PUD
> select HAVE_PCI
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/ftrace.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/ftrace.h
> index 04dad3380..8b17a4c66 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/ftrace.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/ftrace.h
> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ struct dyn_arch_ftrace {
> };
> #endif
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE
> +#if defined(CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE) || defined(CONFIG_OPTPROBES)
> /*
> * A general call in RISC-V is a pair of insts:
> * 1) auipc: setting high-20 pc-related bits to ra register
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h
> index 217ef89f2..6c5e10709 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kprobes.h
> @@ -43,5 +43,33 @@ bool kprobe_single_step_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
> void __kretprobe_trampoline(void);
> void __kprobes *trampoline_probe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OPTPROBES
> +
> +#define MAX_OPTIMIZED_LENGTH 8
> +
> +/* optinsn template addresses */
> +extern __visible kprobe_opcode_t optprobe_template_entry[];
> +extern __visible kprobe_opcode_t optprobe_template_val[];
> +extern __visible kprobe_opcode_t optprobe_template_call[];
> +extern __visible kprobe_opcode_t optprobe_template_store_epc[];
> +extern __visible kprobe_opcode_t optprobe_template_end[];
> +extern __visible kprobe_opcode_t optprobe_template_sub_sp[];
> +extern __visible kprobe_opcode_t optprobe_template_add_sp[];
> +extern __visible kprobe_opcode_t optprobe_template_restore_begin[];
> +extern __visible kprobe_opcode_t optprobe_template_restore_orig_insn[];
> +extern __visible kprobe_opcode_t optprobe_template_restore_end[];
> +
> +#define MAX_OPTINSN_SIZE \
> + ((unsigned long)optprobe_template_end - \
> + (unsigned long)optprobe_template_entry)
> +
> +#define MAX_COPIED_INSN 2
> +struct arch_optimized_insn {
> + kprobe_opcode_t copied_insn[MAX_COPIED_INSN];
> + /* detour code buffer */
> + kprobe_opcode_t *insn;
> +};
> +#define RVI_INST_SIZE 4
> +#endif /* CONFIG_OPTPROBES */
> #endif /* CONFIG_KPROBES */
> #endif /* _ASM_RISCV_KPROBES_H */
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile
> index 7f0840dcc..6255b4600 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/Makefile
> @@ -3,4 +3,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES) += kprobes.o decode-insn.o simulate-insn.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES) += kprobes_trampoline.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE) += ftrace.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_UPROBES) += uprobes.o decode-insn.o simulate-insn.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_OPTPROBES) += opt.o opt_trampoline.o
> CFLAGS_REMOVE_simulate-insn.o = $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE)
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/opt.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/opt.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..b9bcf6e12
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/opt.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,483 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> +/*
> + * Kernel Probes Jump Optimization (Optprobes)
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) IBM Corporation, 2002, 2004
> + * Copyright (C) Hitachi Ltd., 2012
> + * Copyright (C) Huawei Inc., 2014
> + * Copyright (C) 2022 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd
> + * Copyright (C) Guokai Chen, 2022
Should this not be your University here?
> + * Author: Guokai Chen chenguokai17@...ls.ucas.ac.cn
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/kprobes.h>
> +#include <linux/jump_label.h>
> +#include <linux/extable.h>
> +#include <linux/stop_machine.h>
> +#include <linux/moduleloader.h>
> +#include <linux/kprobes.h>
> +#include <linux/cacheflush.h>
> +/* for patch_text */
> +#include <asm/ftrace.h>
> +#include <asm/patch.h>
> +#include "simulate-insn.h"
> +#include "decode-insn.h"
> +
> +
> +#define JUMP_SIZE 8
> +
> +/*
> + * If the probed instruction doesn't use PC and is not system or fence
> + * we can copy it into template and have it executed directly without
> + * simulation or emulation.
> + */
> +enum probe_insn __kprobes can_kprobe_direct_exec(kprobe_opcode_t *addr)
> +{
> + /*
> + * instructions that use PC
> + * branch jump auipc
> + * instructions that belongs to system or fence
> + * ebreak ecall fence.i
Please use the full columns available to you for comments.
> + */
> + kprobe_opcode_t inst = *addr;
> +
> + RISCV_INSN_REJECTED(system, inst);
> + RISCV_INSN_REJECTED(fence, inst);
> + RISCV_INSN_REJECTED(branch, inst);
> + RISCV_INSN_REJECTED(jal, inst);
> + RISCV_INSN_REJECTED(jalr, inst);
> + RISCV_INSN_REJECTED(auipc, inst);
> + return INSN_GOOD_NO_SLOT;
> +}
> +
> +#define TMPL_VAL_IDX \
> + ((kprobe_opcode_t *)optprobe_template_val - \
> + (kprobe_opcode_t *)optprobe_template_entry)
> +#define TMPL_CALL_IDX \
> + ((kprobe_opcode_t *)optprobe_template_call - \
> + (kprobe_opcode_t *)optprobe_template_entry)
> +#define TMPL_STORE_EPC_IDX \
> + ((kprobe_opcode_t *)optprobe_template_store_epc - \
> + (kprobe_opcode_t *)optprobe_template_entry)
> +#define TMPL_END_IDX \
> + ((kprobe_opcode_t *)optprobe_template_end - \
> + (kprobe_opcode_t *)optprobe_template_entry)
> +#define TMPL_ADD_SP \
> + ((kprobe_opcode_t *)optprobe_template_add_sp - \
> + (kprobe_opcode_t *)optprobe_template_entry)
> +#define TMPL_SUB_SP \
> + ((kprobe_opcode_t *)optprobe_template_sub_sp - \
> + (kprobe_opcode_t *)optprobe_template_entry)
> +#define TMPL_RESTORE_BEGIN \
> + ((kprobe_opcode_t *)optprobe_template_restore_begin - \
> + (kprobe_opcode_t *)optprobe_template_entry)
> +#define TMPL_RESTORE_ORIGN_INSN \
> + ((kprobe_opcode_t *)optprobe_template_restore_orig_insn - \
> + (kprobe_opcode_t *)optprobe_template_entry)
> +#define TMPL_RESTORE_RET \
> + ((kprobe_opcode_t *)optprobe_template_ret - \
> + (kprobe_opcode_t *)optprobe_template_entry)
> +#define TMPL_RESTORE_END \
> + ((kprobe_opcode_t *)optprobe_template_restore_end - \
> + (kprobe_opcode_t *)optprobe_template_entry)
> +
> +#define FREE_SEARCH_DEPTH 32
> +
> +/*
> + * RISC-V can always optimize an instruction if not null
> + */
> +int arch_prepared_optinsn(struct arch_optimized_insn *optinsn)
> +{
> + return optinsn->insn != NULL;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * In RISC-V ISA, jal has a quite limited jump range
> + * To achive adequate range, auipc+jalr is utilized
> + * It requires a replacement of two instructions
> + * thus next instruction should be examined
Please use the full columns available to you for comments.
> + */
> +int arch_check_optimized_kprobe(struct optimized_kprobe *op)
> +{
> + struct kprobe *p;
> +
> + p = get_kprobe(op->kp.addr + 4);
Where does this 4 come from?
> + if (p && !kprobe_disabled(p))
> + return -EEXIST;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * In RISC-V ISA, auipc+jalr requires a free register
> + * Inspired by register renaming in OoO processor,
> + * we search backwards to find such a register that:
> + * not previously used as a source register &&
> + * is used as a destination register &&
> + * before any branch/jump instruction
Ditto re comment width.
> + */
> +static int
> +__arch_find_free_register(kprobe_opcode_t *addr, int use_orig,
> + kprobe_opcode_t orig)
> +{
> + int i, rs1, rs2, rd;
> + kprobe_opcode_t inst;
> + int rs_mask = 0;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < FREE_SEARCH_DEPTH; i++) {
> + if (i == 0 && use_orig)
> + inst = orig;
> + else
> + inst = *(kprobe_opcode_t *) (addr + i);
> + /*
> + * Detailed handling:
> + * jalr/branch/system: must have reached the end, no result
> + * jal: if not chosen as result, must have reached the end
> + * arithmetic/load/store: record their rs
> + * jal/arithmetic/load: if proper rd found, return result
> + * others (float point/vector): ignore
> + */
> + if (riscv_insn_is_branch(inst) || riscv_insn_is_jalr(inst)
> + || riscv_insn_is_system(inst)) {
> + return 0;
> + }
> + /* instructions that has rs1 */
> + if (riscv_insn_is_arith_ri(inst) || riscv_insn_is_arith_rr(inst)
> + || riscv_insn_is_load(inst) || riscv_insn_is_store(inst)
> + || riscv_insn_is_amo(inst)) {
> + rs1 = (inst & 0xF8000) >> 15;
> + rs_mask |= 1 << rs1;
> + }
> + /* instructions that has rs2 */
> + if (riscv_insn_is_arith_rr(inst) || riscv_insn_is_store(inst)
> + || riscv_insn_is_amo(inst)) {
> + rs2 = (inst & 0x1F00000) >> 20;
> + rs_mask |= 1 << rs2;
> + }
> + /* instructions that has rd */
> + if (riscv_insn_is_lui(inst) || riscv_insn_is_jal(inst)
> + || riscv_insn_is_load(inst) || riscv_insn_is_arith_ri(inst)
> + || riscv_insn_is_arith_rr(inst) || riscv_insn_is_amo(inst)) {
> + rd = (inst & 0xF80) >> 7;
> + if (rd != 0 && (rs_mask & (1 << rd)) == 0)
> + return rd;
> + if (riscv_insn_is_jal(inst))
> + return 0;
> + }
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * If two free registers can be found at the beginning of both
> + * the start and the end of replaced code, it can be optimized
> + * Also, in-function jumps need to be checked to make sure that
> + * there is no jump to the second instruction to be replaced
> + */
> +
> +#define branch_imm(opcode) \
> + (((((opcode) >> 8) & 0xf) << 1) | \
> + ((((opcode) >> 25) & 0x3f) << 5) | \
> + ((((opcode) >> 7) & 0x1) << 11) | \
> + ((((opcode) >> 31) & 0x1) << 12))
All the numbers in here are quite meaningless to me.
Could you please use defines here?
> +
> +#define branch_offset(opcode) \
> + sign_extend32((branch_imm(opcode)), 12)
> +
> +#define jal_imm(opcode) \
> + ((((opcode >> 21) & 0x3ff) << 1) | \
> + (((opcode >> 20) & 0x1) << 11) | \
> + (((opcode >> 31) & 0x1) << 20))
> +#define jal_offset(opcode) \
> + sign_extend32(jal_imm(opcode), 20)
> +
> +static int can_optimize(unsigned long paddr, kprobe_opcode_t orig)
> +{
> + unsigned long addr, size = 0, offset = 0, target;
> + s32 imm;
> + kprobe_opcode_t inst;
> +
> + if (!kallsyms_lookup_size_offset(paddr, &size, &offset))
> + return 0;
> +
> + addr = paddr - offset;
> +
> + /* if there are not enough space for our kprobe, skip */
> + if (addr + size <= paddr + MAX_OPTIMIZED_LENGTH)
> + return 0;
> +
> + while (addr < paddr - offset + size) {
> + /* Check from the start until the end */
> +
> + inst = *(kprobe_opcode_t *)addr;
> + /* branch and jal is capable of determing target before execution */
> + if (riscv_insn_is_branch(inst)) {
> + imm = branch_offset(inst);
> + target = addr + imm;
> + if (target == paddr + RVI_INST_SIZE)
> + return 0;
> + } else if (riscv_insn_is_jal(inst)) {
> + imm = jal_offset(inst);
> + target = addr + imm;
> + if (target == paddr + RVI_INST_SIZE)
> + return 0;
> + }
> + /* RVI is always 4 byte long */
> + addr += 4;
> + }
> +
> + if (can_kprobe_direct_exec((kprobe_opcode_t *)(paddr + 4)) != INSN_GOOD_NO_SLOT)
> + return 0;
> +
> + /* only valid when we find two free registers */
> + return __arch_find_free_register((kprobe_opcode_t *) paddr, 1, orig)
> + && __arch_find_free_register((kprobe_opcode_t *) (paddr + JUMP_SIZE), 0, 0);
> +}
> +
> +/* Free optimized instruction slot */
> +static void
> +__arch_remove_optimized_kprobe(struct optimized_kprobe *op, int dirty)
> +{
> + if (op->optinsn.insn) {
> + free_optinsn_slot(op->optinsn.insn, dirty);
> + op->optinsn.insn = NULL;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +extern void kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
> +
> +static void
> +optimized_callback(struct optimized_kprobe *op, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags;
> + struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb;
> +
> + /* Save skipped registers */
> + regs->epc = (unsigned long)op->kp.addr;
> + regs->orig_a0 = ~0UL;
> +
> + local_irq_save(flags);
> + kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
> +
> + if (kprobe_running()) {
> + kprobes_inc_nmissed_count(&op->kp);
> + } else {
> + __this_cpu_write(current_kprobe, &op->kp);
> + kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE;
> + opt_pre_handler(&op->kp, regs);
> + __this_cpu_write(current_kprobe, NULL);
> + }
> +
> + local_irq_restore(flags);
> +}
> +
> +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(optimized_callback)
> +static inline kprobe_opcode_t
> +__arch_patch_rd(kprobe_opcode_t inst, unsigned long val)
> +{
> + inst &= 0xfffff07fUL;
It'd be nice if these were defines too, so that it was clear to
the untrained eye what's going on here.
> + inst |= val << 7;
> + return inst;
> +}
> +
> +static inline kprobe_opcode_t
> +__arch_patch_rs1(kprobe_opcode_t inst, unsigned long val)
> +{
> + inst &= 0xfff07fffUL;
> + inst |= val << 15;
> + return inst;
> +}
> +
> +static inline kprobe_opcode_t __arch_patch_rs2(kprobe_opcode_t inst,
> + unsigned long val)
> +{
> + inst &= 0xfe0fffffUL;
> + inst |= val << 20;
> + return inst;
> +}
> +
> +int
> +arch_prepare_optimized_kprobe(struct optimized_kprobe *op, struct kprobe *orig)
> +{
> + kprobe_opcode_t *code, *detour_slot, *detour_ret_addr;
> + long rel_chk;
> + unsigned long val;
> +
> + /* not aligned address */
> + #ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_C
Please use IS_ENABLED() here if you can.
> + return -ERANGE;
> + #endif
> +
> + if (!can_optimize((unsigned long)orig->addr, orig->opcode))
> + return -EILSEQ;
> +
> + code = kzalloc(MAX_OPTINSN_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> + detour_slot = get_optinsn_slot();
> +
> + if (!code || !detour_slot) {
> + kfree(code);
> + if (detour_slot)
> + free_optinsn_slot(detour_slot, 0);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Verify if the address gap is within 4GB range, because this uses
> + * a auipc+jalr pair.
> + */
> + rel_chk = (long)detour_slot - (long)orig->addr + 8;
> + if (abs(rel_chk) > 0x7fffffff) {
GENMASK please.
> + /*
> + * Different from x86, we free code buf directly instead of
> + * calling __arch_remove_optimized_kprobe() because
> + * we have not fill any field in op.
> + */
> + kfree(code);
> + free_optinsn_slot(detour_slot, 0);
> + return -ERANGE;
> + }
> +
> + /* Copy arch-dep-instance from template. */
> + memcpy(code, (unsigned long *)optprobe_template_entry,
> + TMPL_END_IDX * sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t));
> +
> + /* Set probe information */
> + val = (unsigned long)op;
> + *(unsigned long *)(&code[TMPL_VAL_IDX]) = val;
> +
> + /* Set probe function call */
> + val = (unsigned long)optimized_callback;
> + *(unsigned long *)(&code[TMPL_CALL_IDX]) = val;
What is the benefit of using val here? I think the comments
are also pointing out the obvious here, no?
> +
> + /* Adjust epc register */
The comments here mainly just say what you're doing & not why
it should be done.
> + val = __arch_find_free_register(orig->addr, 1, orig->opcode);
> + /*
> + * patch rs2 of optprobe_template_store_epc
> + * after patch, optprobe_template_store_epc will be
> + * REG_S free_register, PT_EPC(sp)
> + */
> + code[TMPL_STORE_EPC_IDX] =
> + __arch_patch_rs2(code[TMPL_STORE_EPC_IDX], val);
> +
> + /* Adjust return temp register */
> + val =
> + __arch_find_free_register(orig->addr +
> + JUMP_SIZE / sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t), 0,
> + 0);
> + /*
> + * patch of optprobe_template_restore_end
> + * patch:
> + * rd and imm of auipc
> + * rs1 and imm of jalr
> + * after patch:
> + * auipc free_register, %hi(return_address)
> + * jalr x0, %lo(return_address)(free_register)
> + *
> + */
> +
> + detour_ret_addr = &(detour_slot[optprobe_template_restore_end - optprobe_template_entry]);
> +
> + make_call(detour_ret_addr, (orig->addr + JUMP_SIZE / sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t)),
> + (code + TMPL_RESTORE_END));
> + code[TMPL_RESTORE_END] = __arch_patch_rd(code[TMPL_RESTORE_END], val);
> + code[TMPL_RESTORE_END + 1] =
> + __arch_patch_rs1(code[TMPL_RESTORE_END + 1], val);
> + code[TMPL_RESTORE_END + 1] = __arch_patch_rd(code[TMPL_RESTORE_END + 1], 0);
> +
> + /* Copy insn and have it executed during restore */
> +
> + code[TMPL_RESTORE_ORIGN_INSN] = orig->opcode;
> + code[TMPL_RESTORE_ORIGN_INSN + 1] =
> + *(kprobe_opcode_t *) (orig->addr + 1);
> +
> + if (patch_text_nosync(detour_slot, code, MAX_OPTINSN_SIZE)) {
> + free_optinsn_slot(detour_slot, 0);
> + kfree(code);
> + return -EPERM;
> + }
> +
> + kfree(code);
> + /* Set op->optinsn.insn means prepared. */
> + op->optinsn.insn = detour_slot;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void __kprobes arch_optimize_kprobes(struct list_head *oplist)
> +{
> + struct optimized_kprobe *op, *tmp;
> + kprobe_opcode_t val;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(op, tmp, oplist, list) {
> + kprobe_opcode_t insn[2];
> +
> + WARN_ON(kprobe_disabled(&op->kp));
> +
> + /*
> + * Backup instructions which will be replaced
> + * by jump address
> + */
> + memcpy(op->optinsn.copied_insn, op->kp.addr, JUMP_SIZE);
> + op->optinsn.copied_insn[0] = op->kp.opcode;
> +
> + make_call(op->kp.addr, op->optinsn.insn, insn);
> +
> + // patch insn jalr to have rd as free register
> + val = (op->optinsn.insn[2] & 0x1F00000) >> 20;
Again, could you use some defines to make this more understandable
to mere mortals like me? ;)
> +
> + insn[0] = __arch_patch_rd(insn[0], val);
> +
> + insn[1] = __arch_patch_rd(insn[1], val);
> + insn[1] = __arch_patch_rs1(insn[1], val);
> +
> + /*
> + * Similar to __arch_disarm_kprobe, operations which
> + * removing breakpoints must be wrapped by stop_machine
> + * to avoid racing.
> + */
> + WARN_ON(patch_text_nosync(op->kp.addr, insn, JUMP_SIZE));
> +
> + list_del_init(&op->list);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static int arch_disarm_kprobe_opt(void *vop)
> +{
> + struct optimized_kprobe *op = (struct optimized_kprobe *)vop;
> +
> + patch_text_nosync(op->kp.addr, op->optinsn.copied_insn, JUMP_SIZE);
> + arch_arm_kprobe(&op->kp);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void arch_unoptimize_kprobe(struct optimized_kprobe *op)
> +{
> + arch_disarm_kprobe_opt((void *)op);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Recover original instructions and breakpoints from relative jumps.
> + * Caller must call with locking kprobe_mutex.
> + */
> +void arch_unoptimize_kprobes(struct list_head *oplist,
> + struct list_head *done_list)
> +{
> + struct optimized_kprobe *op, *tmp;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(op, tmp, oplist, list) {
> + arch_unoptimize_kprobe(op);
> + list_move(&op->list, done_list);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +int arch_within_optimized_kprobe(struct optimized_kprobe *op,
> + kprobe_opcode_t *addr)
> +{
> + return (op->kp.addr <= addr &&
> + op->kp.addr + (JUMP_SIZE / sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t)) > addr);
> +
> +}
> +
> +void arch_remove_optimized_kprobe(struct optimized_kprobe *op)
> +{
> + __arch_remove_optimized_kprobe(op, 1);
> +}
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/opt_trampoline.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/opt_trampoline.S
Thanks,
Conor.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists