[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220831112028.00002566@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 11:20:28 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
To: Robert Richter <rrichter@....com>
CC: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Ben Widawsky <bwidawsk@...nel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
<linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/15] cxl/acpi: Check RCH's PCIe Host Bridge ACPI ID
On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 10:15:55 +0200
Robert Richter <rrichter@....com> wrote:
> An RCH is a root bridge and has "PNP0A08" or "ACPI0016" ACPI ID set.
> Check this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@....com>
Hi Robert,
I'm a little uncomfortable with repurposing acpi_device_id
as you have done here. Might be better to do the same
as in pci_root.c where the matches are done more directly.
> ---
> drivers/cxl/acpi.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/acpi.c b/drivers/cxl/acpi.c
> index a19e3154dd44..ffdf439adb87 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/acpi.c
> @@ -312,9 +312,16 @@ static int add_root_nvdimm_bridge(struct device *match, void *data)
> return 1;
> }
>
> +static const struct acpi_device_id cxl_host_ids[] = {
> + { "ACPI0016", 0 },
> + { "PNP0A08", 0 },
> + { },
Trivial but no comma after a null terminator. Always good to make
it harder for people to add things where they really shouldn't!
pci_root.c avoids using an acpi_device_id table for similar matching.
I think the point being to separate probe type use of this table
from cases where we aren't using a normal device probe.
So to remain consistent with that, I would just grab the hid
and match it directly in this code.
I don't feel that strongly about this if the ACPI maintainers are
fine with reusing this infrastructure as you have it here.
> +};
> +
> struct pci_host_bridge *cxl_find_next_rch(struct pci_host_bridge *host)
> {
> struct pci_bus *bus = host ? host->bus : NULL;
> + struct acpi_device *adev;
>
> while ((bus = pci_find_next_bus(bus)) != NULL) {
> host = bus ? to_pci_host_bridge(bus->bridge) : NULL;
> @@ -323,6 +330,19 @@ struct pci_host_bridge *cxl_find_next_rch(struct pci_host_bridge *host)
>
> dev_dbg(&host->dev, "PCI bridge found\n");
>
> + /* Must be a root bridge */
> + if (host->bus->parent)
> + continue;
> +
> + dev_dbg(&host->dev, "PCI bridge is root bridge\n");
> +
> + adev = ACPI_COMPANION(&host->dev);
> + if (acpi_match_device_ids(adev, cxl_host_ids))
> + continue;
> +
> + dev_dbg(&host->dev, "PCI ACPI host found: %s\n",
> + acpi_dev_name(adev));
> +
> return host;
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists