linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: lan9662-otpc: document Lan9662 OTPC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 31 Aug 2022 12:44:55 +0200
From:   Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
CC:     <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: lan9662-otpc: document Lan9662 OTPC

The 08/31/2022 10:28, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

Hi Krzysztof,

> > +
> > +properties:
> > +  compatible:
> > +    oneOf:
> > +      - items:
> > +          - const: microchip,lan9662-otpc
> > +          - const: microchip,lan9668-otpc
> > +      - enum:
> > +          - microchip,lan9662-otpc
> 
> This is not what I wrote and this does not make sense. You now listed
> twice 9662 and 9668 does not have its entry.

As you figured it out, I am quite noob at these bindings.
The only difference between what you wrote and what I wrote is the order
under items. So the order matters?

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

-- 
/Horatiu