linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] audit: remove obvious unnecessary header files

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 31 Aug 2022 09:04:04 +0800
From:   chi wu <wuchi.zero@...il.com>
To:     Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Cc:     eparis@...hat.com, linux-audit@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] audit: remove obvious unnecessary header files

Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com> 于2022年8月31日周三 08:49写道：
>
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 8:20 PM chi wu <wuchi.zero@...il.com> wrote:
> > Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com> 于2022年8月31日周三 01:04写道：
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Wuchi, can you explain what process you used to determine that
> > > these header file includes were unnecessary?
> >
> > When reading the code, if I don't found the user of the *.h in the *.c
> > file,I will think that is unnecessary. For example, #include
> > <linux/kthread.h> in the audit.c, I don't found the use of kthread* in
> > the file.
> > But, I just build that without "W=1 " , the after test robot show that I
> > was wrong. and I don't sure that if it is true to remove some header
> > files.
>
> Yes, I would recommend that you focus your time and energy on other
> tasks within the Linux Kernel.  I'm very happy to see patches which
> improve the audit subsystem, but I don't believe verifying the header
> file usage is a good use of time at this point.
>
thanks very much

> --
> paul-moore.com