[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <95b5a18c-8f31-81d6-c878-17d32ae8d7e6@xs4all.nl>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2022 08:34:02 +0200
From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>
To: Jilin Yuan <yuanjilin@...rlc.com>, mchehab@...nel.org,
jacopo@...ndi.org, laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: v4l2-tpg: Use 'unsigned int' instead of just
'unsigned'.
Hi Jilin,
On 9/1/22 03:11, Jilin Yuan wrote:
> 'unsigned int' should be clearer than 'unsigned'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jilin Yuan <yuanjilin@...rlc.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/common/v4l2-tpg/v4l2-tpg-core.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
I don't get it, just 8 changes? If I do a 'git grep unsigned drivers/media/common/v4l2-tpg'
I get 128 hits, and include/media/tpg/v4l2-tpg.h has another 52.
What's the point of changing just a few of these instances instead of doing
them all?
In any case, patches like this just create a lot of noise and take away too
much code reviewer bandwidth for very little gain.
Speaking for the media subsystem I will reject patches like this, it's not
worth the effort.
Regards,
Hans
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/common/v4l2-tpg/v4l2-tpg-core.c b/drivers/media/common/v4l2-tpg/v4l2-tpg-core.c
> index 9b7bcdce6e44..10ed9e65eecc 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/common/v4l2-tpg/v4l2-tpg-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/common/v4l2-tpg/v4l2-tpg-core.c
> @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ void tpg_set_font(const u8 *f)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpg_set_font);
>
> -void tpg_init(struct tpg_data *tpg, unsigned w, unsigned h)
> +void tpg_init(struct tpg_data *tpg, unsigned int w, unsigned int h)
> {
> memset(tpg, 0, sizeof(*tpg));
> tpg->scaled_width = tpg->src_width = w;
> @@ -109,15 +109,15 @@ void tpg_init(struct tpg_data *tpg, unsigned w, unsigned h)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpg_init);
>
> -int tpg_alloc(struct tpg_data *tpg, unsigned max_w)
> +int tpg_alloc(struct tpg_data *tpg, unsigned int max_w)
> {
> - unsigned pat;
> - unsigned plane;
> + unsigned int pat;
> + unsigned int plane;
>
> tpg->max_line_width = max_w;
> for (pat = 0; pat < TPG_MAX_PAT_LINES; pat++) {
> for (plane = 0; plane < TPG_MAX_PLANES; plane++) {
> - unsigned pixelsz = plane ? 2 : 4;
> + unsigned int pixelsz = plane ? 2 : 4;
>
> tpg->lines[pat][plane] =
> vzalloc(array3_size(max_w, 2, pixelsz));
> @@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ int tpg_alloc(struct tpg_data *tpg, unsigned max_w)
> }
> }
> for (plane = 0; plane < TPG_MAX_PLANES; plane++) {
> - unsigned pixelsz = plane ? 2 : 4;
> + unsigned int pixelsz = plane ? 2 : 4;
>
> tpg->contrast_line[plane] =
> vzalloc(array_size(pixelsz, max_w));
> @@ -153,8 +153,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpg_alloc);
>
> void tpg_free(struct tpg_data *tpg)
> {
> - unsigned pat;
> - unsigned plane;
> + unsigned int pat;
> + unsigned int plane;
>
> for (pat = 0; pat < TPG_MAX_PAT_LINES; pat++)
> for (plane = 0; plane < TPG_MAX_PLANES; plane++) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists