[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YxBYgcyP7IvMLJwq@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2022 09:00:17 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mhocko@...e.com, vbabka@...e.cz,
hannes@...xchg.org, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, dave@...olabs.net,
willy@...radead.org, liam.howlett@...cle.com, void@...ifault.com,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, ldufour@...ux.ibm.com, peterx@...hat.com,
david@...hat.com, axboe@...nel.dk, mcgrof@...nel.org,
masahiroy@...nel.org, nathan@...nel.org, changbin.du@...el.com,
ytcoode@...il.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com, cl@...ux.com,
penberg@...nel.org, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, 42.hyeyoo@...il.com,
glider@...gle.com, elver@...gle.com, dvyukov@...gle.com,
shakeelb@...gle.com, songmuchun@...edance.com, arnd@...db.de,
jbaron@...mai.com, rientjes@...gle.com, minchan@...gle.com,
kaleshsingh@...gle.com, kernel-team@...roid.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org, linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/30] Code tagging framework and applications
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 11:19:48AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> It's also unclear *who* would enable this. It looks like it would mostly
> have value during the development stage of an embedded platform to track
> kernel memory usage on a per-application basis in an environment where it
> may be difficult to setup tracing and tracking. Would it ever be enabled
> in production?
Afaict this is developer only; it is all unconditional code.
> Would a distribution ever enable this?
I would sincerely hope not. Because:
> If it's enabled, any overhead cannot be disabled/enabled at run or
> boot time so anyone enabling this would carry the cost without never
> necessarily consuming the data.
this.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists