[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220901070028.gdm7uiszm35iom3e@vireshk-i7>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2022 12:30:28 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: "Yuan, Perry" <Perry.Yuan@....com>
Cc: "rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"Huang, Ray" <Ray.Huang@....com>,
"Sharma, Deepak" <Deepak.Sharma@....com>,
"Limonciello, Mario" <Mario.Limonciello@....com>,
"Fontenot, Nathan" <Nathan.Fontenot@....com>,
"Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@....com>,
"Su, Jinzhou (Joe)" <Jinzhou.Su@....com>,
"Huang, Shimmer" <Shimmer.Huang@....com>,
"Du, Xiaojian" <Xiaojian.Du@....com>,
"Meng, Li (Jassmine)" <Li.Meng@....com>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] cpufreq: amd-pstate: cleanup the unused and
duplicated headers declaration
On 01-09-22, 06:56, Yuan, Perry wrote:
> > On 01-09-22, 14:23, Perry Yuan wrote:
> > > Cleanup the headers declaration which are not used actually and
> >
> > This is okay.
>
> Thank you help to confirm this .
>
> >
> > > some duplicated declaration which is declarated in some other headers
> > > already, it will help to simplify the header part.
> >
> > This isn't.
> >
> > Every file should directly include headers they use definitions from, instead of
> > relying on indirect inclusions.
> >
> > --
> > Viresh
>
> Do I need to update the commit with another V7 version ?
I am not sure which headers you removed are still required, working
for now since included indirectly. If there are any, then better to
get a new version out.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists