lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 1 Sep 2022 14:55:30 +0200
From:   Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
To:     Maíra Canal <mairacanal@...eup.net>
Cc:     Isabella Basso <isabbasso@...eup.net>, magalilemes00@...il.com,
        tales.aparecida@...il.com, mwen@...lia.com, andrealmeid@...eup.net,
        siqueirajordao@...eup.net, Trevor Woerner <twoerner@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>,
        David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>, brendanhiggins@...gle.com,
        Arthur Grillo <arthur.grillo@....br>,
        michal.winiarski@...el.com,
        José Expósito <jose.exposito89@...il.com>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        kunit-dev@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/tests: Change "igt_" prefix to "test_drm_"

Hi,

On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 09:42:10AM -0300, Maíra Canal wrote:
> With the introduction of KUnit, IGT is no longer the only option to run
> the DRM unit tests, as the tests can be run through kunit-tool or on
> real hardware with CONFIG_KUNIT.
> 
> Therefore, remove the "igt_" prefix from the tests and replace it with
> the "test_drm_" prefix, making the tests' names independent from the tool
> used.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maíra Canal <mairacanal@...eup.net>
>
> ---
> v1 -> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20220830211603.191734-1-mairacanal@riseup.net/
> - Change "drm_" prefix to "test_drm_", as "drm_" can be a bit confusing (Jani Nikula).

I appreciate it's a bit of a bikeshed but I disagree with this. The
majority of the kunit tests already out there start with the framework
name, including *all* the examples in the kunit doc. Plus, it's fairly
obvious that it's a test, kunit is only about running tests in the first
place.

Maxime

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ