linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/tests: Change "igt_" prefix to "test_drm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <087acab2-c230-fe5d-9ab3-2b8a18e42175@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 1 Sep 2022 15:17:25 +0200
From:   Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
To:     Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>,
        Maíra Canal <mairacanal@...eup.net>
Cc:     michal.winiarski@...el.com, David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
        siqueirajordao@...eup.net, magalilemes00@...il.com,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, tales.aparecida@...il.com,
        Arthur Grillo <arthur.grillo@....br>,
        brendanhiggins@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        mwen@...lia.com, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
        José Expósito <jose.exposito89@...il.com>,
        Isabella Basso <isabbasso@...eup.net>, andrealmeid@...eup.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/tests: Change "igt_" prefix to "test_drm_"

On 9/1/22 14:55, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 09:42:10AM -0300, Maíra Canal wrote:
>> With the introduction of KUnit, IGT is no longer the only option to run
>> the DRM unit tests, as the tests can be run through kunit-tool or on
>> real hardware with CONFIG_KUNIT.
>>
>> Therefore, remove the "igt_" prefix from the tests and replace it with
>> the "test_drm_" prefix, making the tests' names independent from the tool
>> used.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maíra Canal <mairacanal@...eup.net>
>>
>> ---
>> v1 -> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20220830211603.191734-1-mairacanal@riseup.net/
>> - Change "drm_" prefix to "test_drm_", as "drm_" can be a bit confusing (Jani Nikula).
> 
> I appreciate it's a bit of a bikeshed but I disagree with this. The
> majority of the kunit tests already out there start with the framework
> name, including *all* the examples in the kunit doc. Plus, it's fairly
> obvious that it's a test, kunit is only about running tests in the first
> place.
>

Agree with Maxime on this.

-- 
Best regards,

Javier Martinez Canillas
Core Platforms
Red Hat