linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: update beryllium compatible property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 2 Sep 2022 00:20:42 -0500
From:   Joel Selvaraj <joelselvaraj.oss@...il.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: update beryllium
 compatible property

Hi Krzysztof Kozlowski,

> The board compatibles are not that important for ABI yet this creates
> precedence, so I am against it. Simple renaming should not be a reason
> to change compatibles.

So what should I do now?
1. Retain "xiaomi,beryllium" for tianma and "xiaomi,beryllium-ebbg" for ebbg?
2. If adding new compatible is not an issue, can I do
"xiaomi,beryllium-tianma", "xiaomi,beryllium", "qcom,sdm845" - for tianma
"xiaomi,beryllium-ebbg", "xiaomi,beryllium", "qcom,sdm845" - for ebbg

Kindly let me know if any other possible solution is present.

Thank you,
Joel Selvaraj