linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6115: Add basic soc dtsi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <eac61be4-7d66-f07c-55ce-2ffb2caabbca@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 4 Sep 2022 16:24:52 +0300
From:   Iskren Chernev <iskren.chernev@...il.com>
To:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:     phone-devel@...r.kernel.org, ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6115: Add basic soc dtsi


On 9/3/22 22:46, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> +		user_contig_mem: memory@...00000 {
>> +			reg = <0x0 0xfbc00000 0x0 0x1000000>;
> Pretty sure this and linux_cma_mem don't need to be reserved at a precise
> location.. I might be wrong, though..

In downstream pretty much no reserved memory location have precise location.
How do you figure out which one is which?

>> +	timer {
>> +		compatible = "arm,armv8-timer";
>> +		interrupts = <GIC_PPI 1 0xf08>,
>> +			     <GIC_PPI 2 0xf08>,
>> +			     <GIC_PPI 3 0xf08>,
>> +			     <GIC_PPI 0 0xf08>;
>> +		clock-frequency = <19200000>;
> Remove clock-frequency if the platform boots without it.

And if not stick it in DTS?