[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YxT/liaotbiOod51@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2022 09:42:14 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: hezhongkun <hezhongkun.hzk@...edance.com>
Cc: lizefan.x@...edance.com, hannes@...xchg.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: Add a new isolated mems.policy type.
Hello,
On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 02:33:03PM +0800, hezhongkun wrote:
> From: Zhongkun He <hezhongkun.hzk@...edance.com>
>
> Mempolicy is difficult to use because it is set in-process
> via a system call. We want to make it easier to use mempolicy
> in cpuset, and we can control low-priority cgroups to
> allocate memory in specified nodes. So this patch want to
> adds the mempolicy interface in cpuset.
>
> The mempolicy priority of cpuset is lower than the task.
> The order of getting the policy is:
> 1) vma mempolicy
> 2) task->mempolicy
> 3) cpuset->mempolicy
> 4) default policy.
>
> cpuset's policy is owned by itself, but descendants will
> get the default mempolicy from parent.
>
> How to use the mempolicy interface:
> echo prefer:2 > /sys/fs/cgroup/zz/cpuset.mems.policy
> echo bind:1-3 > /sys/fs/cgroup/zz/cpuset.mems.policy
> echo interleave:0,1,2,3 >/sys/fs/cgroup/zz/cpuset.mems.policy
> Show the policy:
> cat /sys/fs/cgroup/zz/cpuset.mems.policy
> prefer:2
> cat /sys/fs/cgroup/zz/cpuset.mems.policy
> bind:1-3
> cat /sys/fs/cgroup/zz/cpuset.mems.policy
> interleave:0-3
> Clear the policy:
> echo default > /sys/fs/cgroup/zz/cpuset.mems.policy
So, I'm a fan of adding cgroup functionalities which don't enforce anything
resource related. What you're proposing can easily be achieved with userland
tooling, right?
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists