[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cf064610-2615-1dcd-0f47-9413f0d648b0@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2022 08:08:19 +0200
From: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
To: Jingyu Wang <jingyuwang_vip@....com>, alexander.deucher@....com,
Xinhui.Pan@....com, airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch,
Hawking.Zhang@....com, ray.huang@....com, Jack.Xiao@....com,
guchun.chen@....com, Likun.Gao@....com, en.brown@...el.com
Cc: amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: cleanup coding style in amdgpu_fence.c
Am 04.09.22 um 21:31 schrieb Jingyu Wang:
> Fix everything checkpatch.pl complained about in amdgpu_fence.c
>
> Signed-off-by: Jingyu Wang <jingyuwang_vip@....com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c | 14 ++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c
> index 8adeb7469f1e..ae9daf653ad3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c
> @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
> /*
> * Copyright 2009 Jerome Glisse.
> * All Rights Reserved.
> @@ -42,7 +43,6 @@
> #include "amdgpu_reset.h"
>
> /*
> - * Fences
> * Fences mark an event in the GPUs pipeline and are used
> * for GPU/CPU synchronization. When the fence is written,
> * it is expected that all buffers associated with that fence
> @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static u32 amdgpu_fence_read(struct amdgpu_ring *ring)
> * Returns 0 on success, -ENOMEM on failure.
> */
> int amdgpu_fence_emit(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, struct dma_fence **f, struct amdgpu_job *job,
> - unsigned flags)
> + unsigned int flags)
> {
> struct amdgpu_device *adev = ring->adev;
> struct dma_fence *fence;
> @@ -173,8 +173,7 @@ int amdgpu_fence_emit(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, struct dma_fence **f, struct amd
> adev->fence_context + ring->idx, seq);
> /* Against remove in amdgpu_job_{free, free_cb} */
> dma_fence_get(fence);
> - }
> - else
> + } else
That will still be complained about. This should be "} else {".
Apart from this nit pick you patches look good to me now.
Thanks,
Christian.
> dma_fence_init(fence, &amdgpu_fence_ops,
> &ring->fence_drv.lock,
> adev->fence_context + ring->idx, seq);
> @@ -393,7 +392,7 @@ signed long amdgpu_fence_wait_polling(struct amdgpu_ring *ring,
> * Returns the number of emitted fences on the ring. Used by the
> * dynpm code to ring track activity.
> */
> -unsigned amdgpu_fence_count_emitted(struct amdgpu_ring *ring)
> +unsigned int amdgpu_fence_count_emitted(struct amdgpu_ring *ring)
> {
> uint64_t emitted;
>
> @@ -422,7 +421,7 @@ unsigned amdgpu_fence_count_emitted(struct amdgpu_ring *ring)
> */
> int amdgpu_fence_driver_start_ring(struct amdgpu_ring *ring,
> struct amdgpu_irq_src *irq_src,
> - unsigned irq_type)
> + unsigned int irq_type)
> {
> struct amdgpu_device *adev = ring->adev;
> uint64_t index;
> @@ -594,6 +593,7 @@ void amdgpu_fence_driver_hw_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>
> for (i = 0; i < AMDGPU_MAX_RINGS; i++) {
> struct amdgpu_ring *ring = adev->rings[i];
> +
> if (!ring || !ring->fence_drv.initialized)
> continue;
>
> @@ -772,6 +772,7 @@ static int amdgpu_debugfs_fence_info_show(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
>
> for (i = 0; i < AMDGPU_MAX_RINGS; ++i) {
> struct amdgpu_ring *ring = adev->rings[i];
> +
> if (!ring || !ring->fence_drv.initialized)
> continue;
>
> @@ -845,6 +846,7 @@ static void amdgpu_debugfs_reset_work(struct work_struct *work)
> reset_work);
>
> struct amdgpu_reset_context reset_context;
> +
> memset(&reset_context, 0, sizeof(reset_context));
>
> reset_context.method = AMD_RESET_METHOD_NONE;
>
> base-commit: e47eb90a0a9ae20b82635b9b99a8d0979b757ad8
> prerequisite-patch-id: f039528bc88876d6e0f64e843da089e85f6d3f58
Powered by blists - more mailing lists