[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6b845257-e8e5-92e4-8cf1-f3e394cbc59e@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2022 09:38:40 +0300
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, agross@...nel.org,
bhupesh.linux@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp-pmics: Remove reg entry for
pmc8280c_lpg node
On 05/09/2022 08:47, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> On 9/5/22 12:52 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 03/09/2022 11:44, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
>>> Commit eeca7d46217c ("arm64: dts: qcom: pm8350c: Drop PWM reg declaration")
>>> dropped PWM reg declaration for pm8350c pwm(s), but there is a leftover
>>> 'reg' entry inside the lpg/pwm node in sc8280xp dts file. Remove the same.
>>>
>>> While at it, also remove the unused unit address in the node
>>> label.
>>>
>>> Fixes: eeca7d46217c ("arm64: dts: qcom: pm8350c: Drop PWM reg declaration")
>>> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>>> Cc: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
>>> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp-pmics.dtsi | 3 +--
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp-pmics.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp-pmics.dtsi
>>> index ae90b97aecb8..2e5cf55afdd5 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp-pmics.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp-pmics.dtsi
>>> @@ -60,9 +60,8 @@ pmc8280c_gpios: gpio@...0 {
>>> #interrupt-cells = <2>;
>>> };
>>>
>>> - pmc8280c_lpg: lpg@...0 {
>>> + pmc8280c_lpg: lpg {
>>
>> I wonder why I did not see the errors when testing all DTSes for
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220828084341.112146-9-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/
>
> I did not see the error while running the 'make dtbs_check' locally, so
> may be something to improve in 'make dtbs_check' infrastructure there.
>
>> Anyway, it cannot be lpg - binding requires "pwm".
>
> I think that should be a separate patch. It does not seem related to
> this change anyways - which fixes eeca7d46217c . I will send a v2 soon.
You would be changing same line twice and eeca7d46217c is not going to
be backported, so I am no sure if there is benefit to make two patches.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists