[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0038fcff-35f1-87e3-aa26-cdd104a13628@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2022 13:21:07 +0200
From: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
To: Arvind Yadav <Arvind.Yadav@....com>, andrey.grodzovsky@....com,
shashank.sharma@....com, amaranath.somalapuram@....com,
Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@....com, sumit.semwal@...aro.org,
gustavo@...ovan.org, airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dma-buf: Check status of enable-signaling bit on
debug
Am 05.09.22 um 12:56 schrieb Arvind Yadav:
> The core DMA-buf framework needs to enable signaling
> before the fence is signaled. The core DMA-buf framework
> can forget to enable signaling before the fence is signaled.
> To avoid this scenario on the debug kernel, check the
> DMA_FENCE_FLAG_ENABLE_SIGNAL_BIT status bit before checking
> the signaling bit status to confirm that enable_signaling
> is enabled.
You might want to put this patch at the end of the series to avoid
breaking the kernel in between.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <Arvind.Yadav@....com>
> ---
> include/linux/dma-fence.h | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-fence.h b/include/linux/dma-fence.h
> index 775cdc0b4f24..60c0e935c0b5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma-fence.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma-fence.h
> @@ -428,6 +428,11 @@ dma_fence_is_signaled_locked(struct dma_fence *fence)
> static inline bool
> dma_fence_is_signaled(struct dma_fence *fence)
> {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
CONFIG_DEBUG_FS is certainly wrong, probably better to check for
CONFIG_DEBUG_WW_MUTEX_SLOWPATH here.
Apart from that looks good to me,
Christian.
> + if (!test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_ENABLE_SIGNAL_BIT, &fence->flags))
> + return false;
> +#endif
> +
> if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &fence->flags))
> return true;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists