linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] riscv: use BIT() marco for cpufeature probing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1e61d31a-9bf5-af79-dbc4-87d63d24b497@microchip.com>
Date:   Mon, 5 Sep 2022 11:19:41 +0000
From:   <Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com>
To:     <heiko@...ech.de>, <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        <palmer@...belt.com>, <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>
CC:     <guoren@...nel.org>, <apatel@...tanamicro.com>,
        <atishp@...osinc.com>, <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] riscv: use BIT() marco for cpufeature probing

On 05/09/2022 12:10, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> Using the appropriate BIT macro makes the code better readable.
> 
> Suggested-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>

Missing the cover-letter with the changelog?
At least, I didn't get it in my inbox. Either way,

Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>

> ---
>   arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index 729f7a218093..08f7445985dc 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -289,10 +289,10 @@ static u32 __init_or_module cpufeature_probe(unsigned int stage)
>          u32 cpu_req_feature = 0;
> 
>          if (cpufeature_probe_svpbmt(stage))
> -               cpu_req_feature |= (1U << CPUFEATURE_SVPBMT);
> +               cpu_req_feature |= BIT(CPUFEATURE_SVPBMT);
> 
>          if (cpufeature_probe_zicbom(stage))
> -               cpu_req_feature |= (1U << CPUFEATURE_ZICBOM);
> +               cpu_req_feature |= BIT(CPUFEATURE_ZICBOM);
> 
>          return cpu_req_feature;
>   }
> --
> 2.35.1
>