[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YxXyTCSKzL42PF1D@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2022 15:57:48 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@...ements.com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/17] pinctrl: cy8c95x0: Allow most of the registers
to be cached
On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 09:42:00PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2022 at 9:36 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > It's unclear why many of static registers were marked as volatile.
>
> the static (yeah, forgot it)
>
> > They are pretty much bidirectional and static in a sense that
> > written value is kept there until a new write or chip reset.
> > Drop those registers from the list to allow them to be cached.
>
> This patch is not correct due to indexing access. It's sneaked since I
> forgot I added it into my main repo. The proper approach should be to
> create virtual registers and decode them before use. This allows to
> cache all ports and as a benefit to debug print all port actual
> statuses.
To be clear: With this one removed from the bunch the rest can be applied w.o.
any change.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists