[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YxdU6hiwblhT2I5u@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2022 17:10:50 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: Eliav Farber <farbere@...zon.com>
Cc: jdelvare@...e.com, linux@...ck-us.net, robh+dt@...nel.org,
p.zabel@...gutronix.de, rtanwar@...linear.com,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hhhawa@...zon.com, jonnyc@...zon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/21] hwmon: (mr75203) fix multi-channel voltage
reading
On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 08:33:41AM +0000, Eliav Farber wrote:
> Fix voltage allocation and reading to support all channels in all VMs.
> Prior to this change allocation and reading were done only for the first
> channel in each VM.
> This change counts the total number of channels for allocation, and takes
> into account the channel offset when reading the sample data register.
...
> + total_ch = ch_num * vm_num;
> + in_config = devm_kcalloc(dev, total_ch + 1,
> sizeof(*in_config), GFP_KERNEL);
Strictly speaking this should be `size_add(size_mul(...) ...)` construction
from overflow.h.
total_ch = size_mul(ch_num, vm_num);
in_config = devm_kcalloc(dev, size_add(total_ch, 1),
sizeof(*in_config), GFP_KERNEL);
Alternatively before doing all these, add a check
if (array3_size(ch_num, vm_num, sizeof(*in_config)) < SIZE_MAX - sizeof(*in_config))
return -EOVERFLOW;
But this is a bit monstrous. Seems like the above looks and feels better.
Also for backporting purposes perhaps it's fine to do without using those macro
helpers.
> if (!in_config)
> return -ENOMEM;
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists