[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SN6PR12MB2767ABA4CEFE4591F87968AD8E7E9@SN6PR12MB2767.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2022 14:17:15 +0000
From: "Kalra, Ashish" <Ashish.Kalra@....com>
To: Marc Orr <marcorr@...gle.com>, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
CC: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev" <linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
"Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Sergio Lopez <slp@...hat.com>, Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Dov Murik <dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com>,
Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum <tobin@....com>,
"Roth, Michael" <Michael.Roth@....com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
Alper Gun <alpergun@...gle.com>,
"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH Part2 v6 09/49] x86/fault: Add support to handle the RMP
fault for user address
[AMD Official Use Only - General]
>> On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 06:55:43PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 11:03:43PM +0000, Ashish Kalra wrote:
>> > > + pfn = pte_pfn(*pte);
>> > > +
>> > > + /* If its large page then calculte the fault pfn */
>> > > + if (level > PG_LEVEL_4K) {
>> > > + unsigned long mask;
>> > > +
>> > > + mask = pages_per_hpage(level) - pages_per_hpage(level - 1);
>> > > + pfn |= (address >> PAGE_SHIFT) & mask;
>> >
>> > Oh boy, this is unnecessarily complicated. Isn't this
>> >
>> > pfn |= pud_index(address);
>> >
>> > or
>> > pfn |= pmd_index(address);
>>
>> I played with this a bit and ended up with
>>
>> pfn = pte_pfn(*pte) | PFN_DOWN(address & page_level_mask(level
>> - 1));
>>
>> Unless I got something terribly wrong, this should do the same (see
>> the attached patch) as the existing calculations.
>Actually, I don't think they're the same. I think Jarkko's version is correct. Specifically:
>- For level = PG_LEVEL_2M they're the same.
>- For level = PG_LEVEL_1G:
>The current code calculates a garbage mask:
>mask = pages_per_hpage(level) - pages_per_hpage(level - 1); translates to:
>>> hex(262144 - 512)
>'0x3fe00'
No actually this is not a garbage mask, as I explained in earlier responses we need to capture the address bits
to get to the correct 4K index into the RMP table.
Therefore, for level = PG_LEVEL_1G:
mask = pages_per_hpage(level) - pages_per_hpage(level - 1) => 0x3fe00 (which is the correct mask).
>But I believe Jarkko's version calculates the correct mask (below), incorporating all 18 offset bits into the 1G page.
>>> hex(262144 -1)
>'0x3ffff'
We can get this simply by doing (page_per_hpage(level)-1), but as I mentioned above this is not what we need.
Thanks,
Ashish
Powered by blists - more mailing lists