[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5e446bfb-a45d-5146-7617-48d1d4798fee@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2022 09:32:43 +0200
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@...rix.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/cpu: Avoid writing MSR_IA32_TSX_CTRL when writing it
is not supported
Hi,
On 9/7/22 01:00, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 06/09/2022 22:00, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 10:56:47PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 9/6/22 22:43, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 10:17:43PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>>> On an Intel Atom N2600 (and presumable other Cedar Trail models)
>>>>> MSR_IA32_TSX_CTRL can be read, causing saved_msr.valid to be set for it
>>>>> by msr_build_context().
>>>>>
>>>>> This causes restore_processor_state() to try and restore it, but writing
>>>>> this MSR is not allowed on the Intel Atom N2600 leading to:
>>>> FWIW, virt tends to do this same thing a lot. They'll allow reading
>>>> random MSRs and only fail on write.
>>> Right. So I guess I should send a v2 with an updated commit
>>> message mentioning this ?
>> Nah, just saying this is a somewhat common pattern with MSRs.
>>
>> The best ones are the one where writing the value read is invalid :/ or
>> those who also silently eat a 0 write just for giggles. Luckily that
>> doesn't happen often.
>
> Several comments. First of all, MSR_TSX_CTRL is a fully read/write
> MSR. If virt is doing this wrong, fix the hypervisor. But this doesn't
> look virt related?
>
> More importantly, MSR_TSX_CTRL does not plausibly exist on an Atom
> N2600, as it is more than a decade old.
>
> MSR_TSX_CTRL was retrofitted in microcode to the MDS_NO, TAA-vulnerable
> CPUs which is a very narrow range from about 1 quarter of 2019 which
> includes Cascade Lake, and then included architecturally on subsequent
> parts which support TSX.
>
> pm_save_spec_msr() is totally broken. It's poking MSRs blindly without
> checking the enumeration of the capability first.
Note I did to a different version of this patch before this which did
add a capability check, but I only send that to various x86-folks +
x86@...nel.org which as Peter pointed out is an alias not a list,
so you will not have seen that earlier version.
I have attached the earlier version to this email.
> In this case, I bet the N2600 has a model specific MSR living at index
> 0x122 which has absolutely nothing at all to do with TSX.
That is my guess too.
Regards,
Hans
View attachment "0001-x86-cpu-Avoid-writing-MSR_IA32_TSX_CTRL-when-tsx_ctr.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (4991 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists