[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEr6+EBHrShLC9oWb0kVpy44gcHoQ-bnLoEN-bA0WR2VN0CLuw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2022 22:00:54 +0800
From: Jeff Xie <xiehuan09@...il.com>
To: Qing Zhang <zhangqing@...ngson.cn>
Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>, hejinyang@...ngson.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/10] LoongArch/ftrace: Fix unwind state when option func_stack_trace
Hi Qing,
On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 7:56 PM Qing Zhang <zhangqing@...ngson.cn> wrote:
>
> Ftrace plays like function head exception, prologue analysis will stop soon
> because PC is at entry.
>
> 90000000004c5a54 <callee>:
> 90000000004c5a54: 03400000 andi $zero, $zero, 0x0 ==>move t0, ra
> 90000000004c5a58: 03400000 andi $zero, $zero, 0x0 ==>bl callsite
> ==>90000000004c5a5c: 02fcc063 addi.d $sp, $sp, -208(0xf30)
> ...
>
> When encountering ftrace_call, save trace function ra at PT_ERA, save parent ra
> at PT_R1, At this time, pc is the position after the two nops of callee. There is
> no conventional prologue operation between this position and the function entry,
> so we need to resetthe first flag to make the caller continue to unwind.
>
> testing method:
> echo path_openat > ./set_ftrace_filter
> echo 1 > ./options/func_stack_trace
> echo function > ./current_tracer
>
> Signed-off-by: Qing Zhang <zhangqing@...ngson.cn>
> ---
> arch/loongarch/include/asm/unwind.h | 2 +-
> arch/loongarch/kernel/unwind_prologue.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/unwind.h b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/unwind.h
> index f66b07c3e6a1..f2b52b9ea93d 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/unwind.h
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/unwind.h
> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ struct unwind_state {
> char type; /* UNWINDER_XXX */
> struct stack_info stack_info;
> struct task_struct *task;
> - bool first, error;
> + bool first, error, is_ftrace;
> int graph_idx;
> unsigned long sp, pc, ra;
> };
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/unwind_prologue.c b/arch/loongarch/kernel/unwind_prologue.c
> index 03f8b31a90cc..0bb19d3ae8ba 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/unwind_prologue.c
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/unwind_prologue.c
> @@ -14,9 +14,7 @@ unsigned long unwind_get_return_address(struct unwind_state *state)
>
> if (unwind_done(state))
> return 0;
> - else if (state->type)
> - return state->pc;
> - else if (state->first)
> + else if (state->type || state->first)
> return state->pc;
>
> return *(unsigned long *)(state->sp);
> @@ -42,16 +40,39 @@ static bool unwind_by_guess(struct unwind_state *state)
> return false;
> }
>
> +static void unwind_state_fixup(struct unwind_state *state)
> +{
> + static unsigned long ftrace_case = (unsigned long)ftrace_call + 4;
> +
> + if (state->pc == ftrace_case)
> + state->is_ftrace = true;
> +}
> +
> static bool unwind_by_prologue(struct unwind_state *state)
> {
> struct stack_info *info = &state->stack_info;
> union loongarch_instruction *ip, *ip_end;
> unsigned long frame_size = 0, frame_ra = -1;
> unsigned long size, offset, pc = state->pc;
> + struct pt_regs *regs;
>
> if (state->sp >= info->end || state->sp < info->begin)
> return false;
>
> + if (state->is_ftrace) {
> + /*
> + * As we meet ftrace_regs_entry, reset first flag like first doing
> + * tracing, Prologue analysis will stop soon because PC is at entry.
> + */
> + regs = (struct pt_regs *)state->sp;
> + state->pc = regs->csr_era;
> + state->ra = regs->regs[1];
> + state->sp = regs->regs[3];
> + state->first = true;
> + state->is_ftrace = false;
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> if (!kallsyms_lookup_size_offset(pc, &size, &offset))
> return false;
>
> @@ -97,7 +118,7 @@ static bool unwind_by_prologue(struct unwind_state *state)
>
> state->pc = *(unsigned long *)(state->sp + frame_ra);
> state->sp = state->sp + frame_size;
> - return !!__kernel_text_address(state->pc);
> + goto out;
>
> first:
> state->first = false;
> @@ -106,7 +127,9 @@ static bool unwind_by_prologue(struct unwind_state *state)
>
> state->pc = state->ra;
>
> - return !!__kernel_text_address(state->ra);
> +out:
> + unwind_state_fixup(state);
> + return !!__kernel_text_address(state->pc);
> }
>
> void unwind_start(struct unwind_state *state, struct task_struct *task,
> --
> 2.20.1
>
The patch looks good.
Tested-by: Jeff Xie <xiehuan09@...il.com>
--
Thanks,
JeffXie
Powered by blists - more mailing lists