[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c5e470aa-f9c4-fcf4-6dbe-35558bbec752@loongson.cn>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 09:38:08 +0800
From: Qing Zhang <zhangqing@...ngson.cn>
To: Jinyang He <hejinyang@...ngson.cn>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
Jeff Xie <xiehuan09@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/10] LoongArch/ftrace: Fix unwind state when option
func_stack_trace
Hi, Jinyang
On 2022/9/7 下午6:40, Jinyang He wrote:
> On 2022/9/7 18:06, Qing Zhang wrote:
>
>> Ftrace plays like function head exception, prologue analysis will stop
>> soon
>> because PC is at entry.
>>
>> 90000000004c5a54 <callee>:
>> 90000000004c5a54: 03400000 andi $zero, $zero, 0x0 ==>move
>> t0, ra
>> 90000000004c5a58: 03400000 andi $zero, $zero, 0x0 ==>bl
>> callsite
>> ==>90000000004c5a5c: 02fcc063 addi.d $sp, $sp, -208(0xf30)
>> ...
>>
>> When encountering ftrace_call, save trace function ra at PT_ERA, save
>> parent ra
>> at PT_R1, At this time, pc is the position after the two nops of
>> callee. There is
>> no conventional prologue operation between this position and the
>> function entry,
>> so we need to resetthe first flag to make the caller continue to unwind.
>>
>> testing method:
>> echo path_openat > ./set_ftrace_filter
>> echo 1 > ./options/func_stack_trace
>> echo function > ./current_tracer
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Qing Zhang <zhangqing@...ngson.cn>
>> ---
>> arch/loongarch/include/asm/unwind.h | 2 +-
>> arch/loongarch/kernel/unwind_prologue.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++----
>> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/unwind.h
>> b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/unwind.h
>> index f66b07c3e6a1..f2b52b9ea93d 100644
>> --- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/unwind.h
>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/unwind.h
>> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ struct unwind_state {
>> char type; /* UNWINDER_XXX */
>> struct stack_info stack_info;
>> struct task_struct *task;
>> - bool first, error;
>> + bool first, error, is_ftrace;
>> int graph_idx;
>> unsigned long sp, pc, ra;
>> };
>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/unwind_prologue.c
>> b/arch/loongarch/kernel/unwind_prologue.c
>> index 03f8b31a90cc..0bb19d3ae8ba 100644
>> --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/unwind_prologue.c
>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/unwind_prologue.c
>> @@ -14,9 +14,7 @@ unsigned long unwind_get_return_address(struct
>> unwind_state *state)
>> if (unwind_done(state))
>> return 0;
>> - else if (state->type)
>> - return state->pc;
>> - else if (state->first)
>> + else if (state->type || state->first)
>> return state->pc;
>> return *(unsigned long *)(state->sp);
>> @@ -42,16 +40,39 @@ static bool unwind_by_guess(struct unwind_state
>> *state)
>> return false;
>> }
>> +static void unwind_state_fixup(struct unwind_state *state)
>> +{
>> + static unsigned long ftrace_case = (unsigned long)ftrace_call + 4;
>> +
>> + if (state->pc == ftrace_case)
>> + state->is_ftrace = true;
>> +}
>> +
>> static bool unwind_by_prologue(struct unwind_state *state)
>> {
>> struct stack_info *info = &state->stack_info;
>> union loongarch_instruction *ip, *ip_end;
>> unsigned long frame_size = 0, frame_ra = -1;
>> unsigned long size, offset, pc = state->pc;
>> + struct pt_regs *regs;
>> if (state->sp >= info->end || state->sp < info->begin)
>> return false;
>> + if (state->is_ftrace) {
>> + /*
>> + * As we meet ftrace_regs_entry, reset first flag like first
>> doing
>> + * tracing, Prologue analysis will stop soon because PC is at
>> entry.
>> + */
>> + regs = (struct pt_regs *)state->sp;
>> + state->pc = regs->csr_era;
>> + state->ra = regs->regs[1];
>> + state->sp = regs->regs[3];
>> + state->first = true;
>> + state->is_ftrace = false;
>> + return true;
>> + }
>> +
>> if (!kallsyms_lookup_size_offset(pc, &size, &offset))
>> return false;
>> @@ -97,7 +118,7 @@ static bool unwind_by_prologue(struct unwind_state
>> *state)
>> state->pc = *(unsigned long *)(state->sp + frame_ra);
>> state->sp = state->sp + frame_size;
>> - return !!__kernel_text_address(state->pc);
>> + goto out;
>> first:
>> state->first = false;
>> @@ -106,7 +127,9 @@ static bool unwind_by_prologue(struct unwind_state
>> *state)
>> state->pc = state->ra;
>> - return !!__kernel_text_address(state->ra);
>> +out:
>> + unwind_state_fixup(state);
>> + return !!__kernel_text_address(state->pc);
>> }
>> void unwind_start(struct unwind_state *state, struct task_struct *task,
>
> Hi, Qing
>
> Additional 'Reported-by: Jeff Xie <xiehuan09@...il.com>' is welcome.
>
> For this patch, Tested-by: Jinyang He <hejinyang@...ngson.cn>.
>
ok, I will add relevant Reported and Tested tags, wait for other
people's comments on the series before this. ping Steven manually. :)
Thanks,
-Qing
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jinyang
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists