[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YxilZbRL0WBR97oi@8bytes.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2022 16:06:29 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>, will@...nel.org,
robin.murphy@....com, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
suravee.suthikulpanit@....com, marcan@...can.st,
sven@...npeter.dev, alyssa@...enzweig.io, robdclark@...il.com,
dwmw2@...radead.org, baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com,
mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com, gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com,
orsonzhai@...il.com, baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com,
zhang.lyra@...il.com, thierry.reding@...il.com, vdumpa@...dia.com,
jonathanh@...dia.com, jean-philippe@...aro.org, cohuck@...hat.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com,
thunder.leizhen@...wei.com, christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr,
yangyingliang@...wei.com, jon@...id-run.com, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, asahi@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
kevin.tian@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] iommu: Return -EMEDIUMTYPE for incompatible
domain and device/group
On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 10:47:39AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> Would you be happier if we wrote it like
>
> #define IOMMU_EINCOMPATIBLE_DEVICE xx
>
> Which tells "which of the function parameters is actually invalid" ?
Having done some Rust hacking in the last months, I have to say I like
to concept of error handling with Result<> there. Ideally we have a way
to emulate that in our C code without having to change all callers.
What I am proposing is a way this could be emulated here, but I am open
to other suggestions. Still better than re-using random error codes for
special purposes.
Regards,
Joerg
Powered by blists - more mailing lists