[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3ea54f9b-896d-c70b-9024-4dc4f99ec2d4@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 15:30:27 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Asutosh Das <quic_asutoshd@...cinc.com>, quic_nguyenb@...cinc.com,
quic_xiaosenh@...cinc.com, stanley.chu@...iatek.com,
adrian.hunter@...el.com, avri.altman@....com, mani@...nel.org,
quic_cang@...cinc.com, beanhuo@...ron.com,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 4/4] ufs: host: qcom: Add MCQ support
On 9/2/22 15:41, Asutosh Das wrote:
> +static int ufs_qcom_get_hba_mac(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> +{
> + return MAX_SUPP_MAC;
> +}
The above implementation is not sufficient to convince me that the
get_hba_mac vop is useful. Please remove this vop and use MAX_SUPP_MAC
directly where ufshcd_mcq_vops_get_hba_mac() is called.
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists