[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YxmNsnCPSPt1SJcz@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 08:37:38 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking: Detect includes rwlock.h outside of spinlock.h
On 2022-08-25 18:08:59 [+0200], To linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org wrote:
> From: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
>
> The check for __LINUX_SPINLOCK_H within rwlock.h (and other files)
> detects the direct include of the header file if it is at the very
> beginning of the include section.
> If it is listed later then chances are high that spinlock.h was already
> included (including rwlock.h) and the additional listing of rwlock.h
> will not cause any failure.
>
> On PREEMPT_RT this additional rwlock.h will lead to compile failures
> since it uses a different rwlock implementation.
>
> Add __LINUX_INSIDE_SPINLOCK_H to spinlock.h and check for this instead
> of __LINUX_SPINLOCK_H to detect wrong includes. This will help detect
> direct includes of rwlock.h with without PREEMPT_RT enabled.
>
> [ bigeasy: add remaining __LINUX_SPINLOCK_H user and rewrite
> commit description. ]
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
> ---
>
> This is to avoid patches like
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220816074816.173227-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de
>
> in the future which is not the first I sent…
polite *ping*
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists