linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 01/13] clk: microchip: mpfs: fix clk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <119b58b7-7757-7f76-1472-8047961c9dd1@microchip.com>
Date:   Thu, 8 Sep 2022 06:44:31 +0000
From:   <Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com>
To:     <Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com>, <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        <sboyd@...nel.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <palmer@...belt.com>,
        <Daire.McNamara@...rochip.com>
CC:     <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <nathan@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/13] clk: microchip: mpfs: fix clk_cfg array bounds
 violation

On 30.08.2022 15:52, Conor Dooley wrote:
> Unnoticed in current code, there is an array bounds violation present
> during clock registration. This seems to fail gracefully in v6.0-rc1,
> and life carrys on. While converting the driver to use standard clock
> structs/ops, kernel panics were seen during boot when built with clang:
> 
> [    0.581754] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000000000b1
> [    0.591520] Oops [#1]
> [    0.594045] Modules linked in:
> [    0.597435] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.0.0-rc1-00011-g8e1459cf4eca #1
> [    0.606188] Hardware name: Microchip PolarFire-SoC Icicle Kit (DT)
> [    0.613012] epc : __clk_register+0x4a6/0x85c
> [    0.617759]  ra : __clk_register+0x49e/0x85c
> [    0.622489] epc : ffffffff803faf7c ra : ffffffff803faf74 sp : ffffffc80400b720
> [    0.630466]  gp : ffffffff810e93f8 tp : ffffffe77fe60000 t0 : ffffffe77ffb3800
> [    0.638443]  t1 : 000000000000000a t2 : ffffffffffffffff s0 : ffffffc80400b7c0
> [    0.646420]  s1 : 0000000000000001 a0 : 0000000000000001 a1 : 0000000000000000
> [    0.654396]  a2 : 0000000000000001 a3 : 0000000000000000 a4 : 0000000000000000
> [    0.662373]  a5 : ffffffff803a5810 a6 : 0000000200000022 a7 : 0000000000000006
> [    0.670350]  s2 : ffffffff81099d48 s3 : ffffffff80d6e28e s4 : 0000000000000028
> [    0.678327]  s5 : ffffffff810ed3c8 s6 : ffffffff810ed3d0 s7 : ffffffe77ffbc100
> [    0.686304]  s8 : ffffffe77ffb1540 s9 : ffffffe77ffb1540 s10: 0000000000000008
> [    0.694281]  s11: 0000000000000000 t3 : 00000000000000c6 t4 : 0000000000000007
> [    0.702258]  t5 : ffffffff810c78c0 t6 : ffffffe77ff88cd0
> [    0.708125] status: 0000000200000120 badaddr: 00000000000000b1 cause: 000000000000000d
> [    0.716869] [<ffffffff803fb892>] devm_clk_hw_register+0x62/0xaa
> [    0.723420] [<ffffffff80403412>] mpfs_clk_probe+0x1e0/0x244
> 
> It fails on "clk_periph_timer" - which uses a different parent, that it
> tries to find using the macro:
> \#define PARENT_CLK(PARENT) (&mpfs_cfg_clks[CLK_##PARENT].cfg.hw)
> 
> If parent is RTCREF, so the macro becomes: &mpfs_cfg_clks[33].cfg.hw
> which is well beyond the end of the array. Amazingly, builds with GCC
> 11.1 see no problem here, booting correctly and hooking the parent up
> etc. Builds with clang-15 do not, with the above panic.
> 
> Drop the macro for the RTCREF and use the array directly to avoid the
> panic, using a newly added define that brings the index into the valid
> range.
> 
> Fixes: 1c6a7ea32b8c ("clk: microchip: mpfs: add RTCREF clock control")
> CC: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs.c b/drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs.c
> index 070c3b896559..9e41f07b3fa6 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@
>  #define MSSPLL_POSTDIV_WIDTH	0x07u
>  #define MSSPLL_FIXED_DIV	4u
>  
> +#define RTCREF_OFFSET		(CLK_RTCREF - CLK_ENVM)
> +
>  struct mpfs_clock_data {
>  	void __iomem *base;
>  	void __iomem *msspll_base;
> @@ -381,7 +383,8 @@ static struct mpfs_periph_hw_clock mpfs_periph_clks[] = {
>  	CLK_PERIPH(CLK_MAC0, "clk_periph_mac0", PARENT_CLK(AHB), 1, 0),
>  	CLK_PERIPH(CLK_MAC1, "clk_periph_mac1", PARENT_CLK(AHB), 2, 0),
>  	CLK_PERIPH(CLK_MMC, "clk_periph_mmc", PARENT_CLK(AHB), 3, 0),
> -	CLK_PERIPH(CLK_TIMER, "clk_periph_timer", PARENT_CLK(RTCREF), 4, 0),
> +	CLK_PERIPH(CLK_TIMER, "clk_periph_timer",
> +		   &mpfs_cfg_clks[CLK_RTCREF - RTCREF_OFFSET].hw, 4, 0),

A personal taste: as clk IDs and clk indexes in mpfs_cfg_clks[] array are
different thing (ID for clk_periph_timer is already different) and the
CLK_RTCREF - RTCREF_OFFSET here is in the end CLK_ENVM = 3 maybe easier to
follow the code would be to add new macros like:

#define CLK_CPU_OFF 0
#define CLK_AXI_OFF 1
#define CLK_AHB_OFF 2
#define CLK_RTCREF_OFF 3

and change the CLK_PARENT() macro something as follows:

#define PARENT_CLK(PARENT) (&mpfs_cfg_clks[CLK_##PARENT##_OFF].hw)

>  	CLK_PERIPH(CLK_MMUART0, "clk_periph_mmuart0", PARENT_CLK(AHB), 5, CLK_IS_CRITICAL),
>  	CLK_PERIPH(CLK_MMUART1, "clk_periph_mmuart1", PARENT_CLK(AHB), 6, 0),
>  	CLK_PERIPH(CLK_MMUART2, "clk_periph_mmuart2", PARENT_CLK(AHB), 7, 0),