| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2022 12:25:39 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Li Huafei <lihuafei1@...wei.com>
Cc: <guoren@...nel.org>, <palmer@...belt.com>, <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
<mingo@...hat.com>, <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
<aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>,
<anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<jszhang@...nel.org>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
<liaochang1@...wei.com>, <me@...ki.ch>, <penberg@...nel.org>,
<linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 2/2] riscv: kprobe: Allow coexistence of
ftrace and kprobe
Hi Li,
On Fri, 9 Sep 2022 10:36:25 +0800
Li Huafei <lihuafei1@...wei.com> wrote:
> When using ftrace and kprobe at the same time, it was found that one
> might cause the other to be unavailable. This can be reproduced by the
> following steps.
Yes, this must be solved by CONFIG_HAVE_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE.
>
> # cd /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/
> # echo cmdline_proc_show > set_ftrace_filter
> # echo function > current_tracer
> # echo 'p cmdline_proc_show' > kprobe_events
> # echo 'p cmdline_proc_show+4' >> kprobe_events
> # ls events/kprobes/
> enable p_cmdline_proc_show_0
> filter p_cmdline_proc_show_4
> # echo 1 > events/kprobes/p_cmdline_proc_show_4/enable
> # echo 1 > events/kprobes/p_cmdline_proc_show_0/enable
> [ 129.830108] 00000000ebed457d: expected (ffdb0097 4f0080e7) but got (00100073 4f0080e7)
> [ 129.835990] ------------[ ftrace bug ]------------
> [ 129.839510] ftrace failed to modify
> [ 129.839536] [<ffffffff80258910>] cmdline_proc_show+0x0/0x46
> [ 129.845831] actual: 23:3c:11:fe:73:00:10:00
> [ 129.849299] Updating ftrace call site to call a different ftrace function
> [ 129.853998] ftrace record flags: e0000002
> [ 129.856771] (2) R
> [ 129.856771] expected tramp: ffffffff80008e60
> [ 129.861688] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 129.865092] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 14 at kernel/trace/ftrace.c:2085 ftrace_bug+0x21a/0x24c
> [ 129.870949] Modules linked in:
> [ 129.873301] CPU: 0 PID: 14 Comm: migration/0 Not tainted 5.18.0-rc3-00002-gd8bfcd250f58 #6
> [ 129.879217] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT)
> [ 129.882666] Stopper: multi_cpu_stop+0x0/0x168 <- stop_machine_cpuslocked+0xfa/0x12e
> [ 129.888430] epc : ftrace_bug+0x21a/0x24c
> [ 129.891254] ra : ftrace_bug+0x21a/0x24c
> [ 129.894057] epc : ffffffff807c3bee ra : ffffffff807c3bee sp : ff20000000283c80
> [ 129.899144] gp : ffffffff813a83b8 tp : ff60000080021600 t0 : ffffffff804155c0
> [ 129.904257] t1 : 0720072007200720 t2 : 7420646574636570 s0 : ff20000000283cb0
> [ 129.909402] s1 : ff6000007fe622a0 a0 : 0000000000000022 a1 : c0000000ffffefff
> [ 129.914472] a2 : 0000000000000001 a3 : 0000000000000000 a4 : 341adec112294700
> [ 129.919487] a5 : 341adec112294700 a6 : 0000000000000730 a7 : 0000000000000030
> [ 129.924595] s2 : ffffffff80258910 s3 : ffffffffffffffea s4 : 0000000000000000
> [ 129.929776] s5 : 0000000000000a35 s6 : ffffffff80d667c8 s7 : ff6000007fe04000
> [ 129.934892] s8 : 0000000000000004 s9 : 0000000000000002 s10: 0000000000000001
> [ 129.939992] s11: 0000000000000003 t3 : ff6000007ff20f00 t4 : ff6000007ff20f00
> [ 129.945134] t5 : ff6000007ff20000 t6 : ff200000002839c8
> [ 129.948838] status: 0000000000000100 badaddr: 0000000000000000 cause: 0000000000000003
> [ 129.954580] [<ffffffff800bf110>] ftrace_replace_code+0xce/0xd0
> [ 129.958771] [<ffffffff800bf280>] ftrace_modify_all_code+0xb4/0x12c
> [ 129.964420] [<ffffffff800bf30a>] __ftrace_modify_code+0x12/0x1c
> [ 129.969163] [<ffffffff800b4ea4>] multi_cpu_stop+0x9a/0x168
> [ 129.973035] [<ffffffff800b4b1c>] cpu_stopper_thread+0xb4/0x15e
> [ 129.977205] [<ffffffff8003457a>] smpboot_thread_fn+0x106/0x1e4
> [ 129.981277] [<ffffffff80030ca6>] kthread+0xee/0x108
> [ 129.984763] [<ffffffff800039ba>] ret_from_exception+0x0/0xc
> [ 129.988809] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> # cat trace
> # tracer: function
> #
> # WARNING: FUNCTION TRACING IS CORRUPTED
> # MAY BE MISSING FUNCTION EVENTS
> # entries-in-buffer/entries-written: 0/0 #P:4
> #
> # _-----=> irqs-off/BH-disabled
> # / _----=> need-resched
> # | / _---=> hardirq/softirq
> # || / _--=> preempt-depth
> # ||| / _-=> migrate-disable
> # |||| / delay
> # TASK-PID CPU# ||||| TIMESTAMP FUNCTION
> # | | | ||||| | |
>
> As you can see, the ftrace functionality is broken. This is because
> DYNAMIC_FTRACE uses 4 instructions to make the jump from the function
> entry to the ftrace trampoline.
>
> After 'echo function > current_tracer':
>
> <cmdline_proc_show>:
> 0xffffffff80258910 <+0>: sd ra,-8(sp)
> 0xffffffff80258914 <+4>: auipc ra,0xffdb0
> 0xffffffff80258918 <+8>: jalr 1264(ra) # 0xffffffff80008e04 <ftrace_caller>
> 0xffffffff8025891c <+12>: ld ra,-8(sp)
>
> After 'echo 1 > events/kprobes/p_cmdline_proc_show_4/enable':
>
> <cmdline_proc_show>:
> 0xffffffff80258910 <+0>: sd ra,-8(sp)
> 0xffffffff80258914 <+4>: ebreak
> 0xffffffff80258918 <+8>: jalr 1264(ra)
> 0xffffffff8025891c <+12>: ld ra,-8(sp)
>
> This time the second instruction is replaced with a breakpoint
> instruction and the ftrace-related instructions are broken. Then, when
> enabling 'p_cmdline_proc_show_0', a regs ftrace handler is registered
> based on KPROBES_ON_FTRACE, ftrace_modify_call() changes 'ftrace_caller'
> to 'ftrace_regs_caller', and checks for ftrace-related instructions is
> modified or not. Here it has been modified, causing ftrace to report a
> warning and disable itself.
>
> In turn, the breakpoints inserted by kprobe may be overwritten by
> ftrace.
In this case, we should NOT probe such address by kprobes. The reason
why I introduce the CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE is to avoid this issue.
>
> The problem is that we think that only the first instruction address at
> the function entry is needed for ftrace, but it is actually the first 4.
> As Masami mentioned in [1], we can treat the first 4 instructions as a
> 16-byte virtual instruction, and func+4, func+8 and func+12 will be
> changed to func+0. This way, ftrace and kprobe do not bother each other
> and can coexist.
>
> After this patch:
>
> # cd /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/
> # echo cmdline_proc_show > set_ftrace_filter
> # echo function > current_tracer
> # echo 'p cmdline_proc_show' > kprobe_events
> # echo 'p cmdline_proc_show+4' >> kprobe_events
> # echo 'p cmdline_proc_show+8' >> kprobe_events
> # echo 'p cmdline_proc_show+12' >> kprobe_events
> # echo 'p cmdline_proc_show+16' >> kprobe_events
Oh, no, I meant, if it is a 16 byte virtual insturiction, it should
reject probing the address inside the instruction. It is rejected as
same as the case you probe "function+1" address (that is not an
instruction boundary, right?)
So, it should reject it instead of modifying the probed address. (Return
-EILSEQ) It is usual there is any instruction which can not be probed.
Or, is there any real reason you "have to" probe such intermediate
address?
Thank you,
> # ls events/kprobes/
> enable p_cmdline_proc_show_12 p_cmdline_proc_show_8
> filter p_cmdline_proc_show_16
> p_cmdline_proc_show_0 p_cmdline_proc_show_4
> # echo 1 > events/kprobes/enable
> # cat ../kprobes/list
> ffffffff8025cba4 k cmdline_proc_show+0x0 [FTRACE]
> ffffffff8025cba4 k cmdline_proc_show+0x0 [FTRACE]
> ffffffff8025cba4 k cmdline_proc_show+0x0 [FTRACE]
> ffffffff8025cba4 k cmdline_proc_show+0x0 [FTRACE]
> ffffffff8025cbb4 k cmdline_proc_show+0x10
> # cat /proc/cmdline
> nokaslr rootwait root=/dev/vda rw
> # cat trace
> # tracer: function
> #
> # entries-in-buffer/entries-written: 6/6 #P:4
> #
> # _-----=> irqs-off/BH-disabled
> # / _----=> need-resched
> # | / _---=> hardirq/softirq
> # || / _--=> preempt-depth
> # ||| / _-=> migrate-disable
> # |||| / delay
> # TASK-PID CPU# ||||| TIMESTAMP FUNCTION
> # | | | ||||| | |
> cat-144 [000] ...2. 179.164908: p_cmdline_proc_show_12: (cmdline_proc_show+0x0/0x46)
> cat-144 [000] ...2. 179.165617: p_cmdline_proc_show_8: (cmdline_proc_show+0x0/0x46)
> cat-144 [000] ...2. 179.165653: p_cmdline_proc_show_4: (cmdline_proc_show+0x0/0x46)
> cat-144 [000] ...2. 179.165655: p_cmdline_proc_show_0: (cmdline_proc_show+0x0/0x46)
> cat-144 [000] ...2. 179.165837: cmdline_proc_show <-seq_read_iter
> cat-144 [000] d.... 179.166099: p_cmdline_proc_show_16: (cmdline_proc_show+0x10/0x46)
>
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/20191218140622.57bbaca5@xhacker.debian/
>
> Fixes: c22b0bcb1dd0 ("riscv: Add kprobes supported")
> Suggested-by: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Li Huafei <lihuafei1@...wei.com>
> ---
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220426015751.88582-1-lihuafei1@huawei.com/
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220819025522.154189-2-lihuafei1@huawei.com/
>
> v2 RESEND:
> - Rebase onto v6.0-rc4.
>
> Changlog in v1 -> v2:
> - Allows probing func+offs(<16) instead of returning -EILSEQ, which
> does not change the arch_adjust_kprobe_addr() interface convention.
> - ftrace_location(addr) is unnecessary, consistent with powerpc and
> x86.
>
> arch/riscv/include/asm/ftrace.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/riscv/kernel/ftrace.c | 26 --------------------------
> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/ftrace.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/ftrace.h
> index 04dad3380041..c59e4a63f1c1 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/ftrace.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/ftrace.h
> @@ -77,6 +77,32 @@ do { \
> */
> #define MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE 8
>
> +/*
> + * Put 16 bytes at the front of the function within the patchable function
> + * entry nops' area.
> + *
> + * 0: REG_S ra, -SZREG(sp)
> + * 1: auipc ra, 0x?
> + * 2: jalr -?(ra)
> + * 3: REG_L ra, -SZREG(sp)
> + *
> + * So the opcodes is:
> + * 0: 0xfe113c23 (sd)/0xfe112e23 (sw)
> + * 1: 0x???????? -> auipc
> + * 2: 0x???????? -> jalr
> + * 3: 0xff813083 (ld)/0xffc12083 (lw)
> + */
> +#if __riscv_xlen == 64
> +#define INSN0 0xfe113c23
> +#define INSN3 0xff813083
> +#elif __riscv_xlen == 32
> +#define INSN0 0xfe112e23
> +#define INSN3 0xffc12083
> +#endif
> +
> +#define FUNC_ENTRY_SIZE 16
> +#define FUNC_ENTRY_JMP 4
> +
> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> struct dyn_ftrace;
> int ftrace_init_nop(struct module *mod, struct dyn_ftrace *rec);
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/ftrace.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/ftrace.c
> index 552088e9acc4..9d951aab662a 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/ftrace.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/ftrace.c
> @@ -70,32 +70,6 @@ static int __ftrace_modify_call(unsigned long hook_pos, unsigned long target,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -/*
> - * Put 16 bytes at the front of the function within the patchable function
> - * entry nops' area.
> - *
> - * 0: REG_S ra, -SZREG(sp)
> - * 1: auipc ra, 0x?
> - * 2: jalr -?(ra)
> - * 3: REG_L ra, -SZREG(sp)
> - *
> - * So the opcodes is:
> - * 0: 0xfe113c23 (sd)/0xfe112e23 (sw)
> - * 1: 0x???????? -> auipc
> - * 2: 0x???????? -> jalr
> - * 3: 0xff813083 (ld)/0xffc12083 (lw)
> - */
> -#if __riscv_xlen == 64
> -#define INSN0 0xfe113c23
> -#define INSN3 0xff813083
> -#elif __riscv_xlen == 32
> -#define INSN0 0xfe112e23
> -#define INSN3 0xffc12083
> -#endif
> -
> -#define FUNC_ENTRY_SIZE 16
> -#define FUNC_ENTRY_JMP 4
> -
> int ftrace_make_call(struct dyn_ftrace *rec, unsigned long addr)
> {
> unsigned int call[4] = {INSN0, 0, 0, INSN3};
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> index e6e950b7cf32..ef7aabec9681 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,26 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe_ctlblk, kprobe_ctlblk);
> static void __kprobes
> post_kprobe_handler(struct kprobe *, struct kprobe_ctlblk *, struct pt_regs *);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE
> +kprobe_opcode_t *arch_adjust_kprobe_addr(unsigned long addr, unsigned long offset,
> + bool *on_func_entry)
> +{
> + /*
> + * The first 4 instructions at the beginning of the ftraced function
> + * are used as a jump to ftrace trampoline, which we can think of as
> + * a 16-byte virtual instruction. func+4, func+8 and func+12 will be
> + * changed to func+0. This allows the function entry to be probed with
> + * the help of KPROBES_ON_FTRACE and does not break ftrace
> + * functionality.
> + */
> + if (offset < FUNC_ENTRY_SIZE)
> + offset = 0;
> +
> + *on_func_entry = !offset;
> + return (kprobe_opcode_t *)(addr + offset);
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> static void __kprobes arch_prepare_ss_slot(struct kprobe *p)
> {
> unsigned long offset = GET_INSN_LENGTH(p->opcode);
> --
> 2.17.1
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists