linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] platform/x86/intel: pmc/core: Add Raptor Lake support to pmc core driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8680a336-f4a2-7cb2-74e3-552220fc2888@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 12 Sep 2022 16:35:39 -0700
From:   "Kammela, Gayatri" <gayatri.kammela@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc:     markgross@...nel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, irenic.rajneesh@...il.com,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...el.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        David Box <david.e.box@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] platform/x86/intel: pmc/core: Add Raptor Lake support
 to pmc core driver

On 9/2/2022 1:55 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On 9/1/22 19:32, Kammela, Gayatri wrote:
>> On 9/1/2022 8:47 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 9/1/22 17:43, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On 8/30/22 20:20, Gayatri Kammela wrote:
>>>>> Add Raptor Lake client parts (both RPL and RPL_S) support to pmc core
>>>>> driver. Raptor Lake client parts reuse all the Alder Lake PCH IPs.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...el.com>
>>>>> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
>>>>> Cc: David Box <david.e.box@...el.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Gayatri Kammela <gayatri.kammela@...ux.intel.com>
>>>> Thank you for your patch, I've applied this patch to my review-hans
>>>> branch:
>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86.git/log/?h=review-hans
>>> In file included from drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c:29:
>>> ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h:161:46: error: ‘INTEL_FAM6_RAPTORLAKE_S’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘INTEL_FAM6_RAPTORLAKE_P’?
>>>     161 |         X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, INTEL_FAM6_##model, data)
>>>         |                                              ^~~~~~~~~~~
>>> ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h:46:27: note: in definition of macro ‘X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_STEPPINGS_FEATURE’
>>>      46 |         .model          = _model,                                       \
>>>         |                           ^~~~~~
>>> ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h:129:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE’
>>>     129 |         X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(vendor, family, model,       \
>>>         |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h:161:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL’
>>>     161 |         X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, INTEL_FAM6_##model, data)
>>>         |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c:1918:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL’
>>>    1918 |         X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(RAPTORLAKE_S,        &adl_reg_map),
>>>         |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> make[5]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:249: drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.o] Error 1
>>>
>>> And dropped again, please upstream this through the tree which also has the new
>>> INTEL_FAM6_RAPTORLAKE* macros.
>>>
>>> Here is my Acked-by for merging this through another tree:
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Hans
>> Hi Hans!
>>
>> Thank you for your Acked-by! The cpuid patch has been merged in to v6.0-rc3. I am not sure why its complaining about INTEL_FAM6_RAPTORLAKE_S being undeclared.
>>
>> patch - ea902bcc1943f7539200ec464de3f54335588774 : "x86/cpu: Add new Raptor Lake CPU model number".
>>
>> I made sure its built without errors before sending it out.
> Ah I see, but my tree (like most trees) is based on 6.0-rc1,
> please submit this patch to the same tree as through which
> ea902bcc1943f7539200ec464de3f54335588774 went upstream,
> with my Acked-by added.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Hans

Hi Hans!

I did send v2 based on review-hans branch with dependency patch 
included. Sorry for the delay and thank you!

>
>
>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>    drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c | 2 ++
>>>>>    1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c
>>>>> index a1fe1e0dcf4a..17ec5825d13d 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c
>>>>> @@ -1914,6 +1914,8 @@ static const struct x86_cpu_id intel_pmc_core_ids[] = {
>>>>>        X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ALDERLAKE_N,        &tgl_reg_map),
>>>>>        X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ALDERLAKE,        &adl_reg_map),
>>>>>        X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(RAPTORLAKE_P,        &tgl_reg_map),
>>>>> +    X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(RAPTORLAKE,        &adl_reg_map),
>>>>> +    X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(RAPTORLAKE_S,    &adl_reg_map),
>>>>>        {}
>>>>>    };
>>>>>   
>>>>> base-commit: b90cb1053190353cc30f0fef0ef1f378ccc063c5