[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220912073455.rlqf6q4rsgydk46h@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 09:34:55 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the battery tree with the i2c tree
Hello,
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 01:03:44PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the battery tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/power/supply/cw2015_battery.c
>
> between commit:
>
> ed5c2f5fd10d ("i2c: Make remove callback return void")
>
> from the i2c tree and commit:
>
> ed5c2f5fd10d ("i2c: Make remove callback return void")
>
> from the battery tree.
The commit from the battery tree is
0cb172a4918e ("power: supply: cw2015: Use device managed API to simplify the code")
> I fixed it up (the latter removed the code modified by the former, so
> I just did that)
I don't see today's tag in git yet, but removing the code sounds right.
> and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as
> linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be
> mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for
> merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the
> maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
@Sebastian: You might want to pull
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wsa/linux i2c/make_remove_callback_void-immutable
into your tree to prepare a smooth merging experience for Linus.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists