[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220912174623.3a7f52b8@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 17:46:23 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the battery tree with the i2c tree
Hi Uwe,
On Mon, 12 Sep 2022 09:34:55 +0200 Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 01:03:44PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the battery tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > drivers/power/supply/cw2015_battery.c
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > ed5c2f5fd10d ("i2c: Make remove callback return void")
> >
> > from the i2c tree and commit:
> >
> > ed5c2f5fd10d ("i2c: Make remove callback return void")
> >
> > from the battery tree.
>
> The commit from the battery tree is
>
> 0cb172a4918e ("power: supply: cw2015: Use device managed API to simplify the code")
Yes, sorry, cut and paste fail :-(
> > I fixed it up (the latter removed the code modified by the former, so
> > I just did that)
>
> I don't see today's tag in git yet, but removing the code sounds right.
Good, and, yeah, I am still going :-)
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists