[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b6b044f6-de87-e85b-0b51-e957b90622ab@microchip.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 07:45:11 +0000
From: <Sergiu.Moga@...rochip.com>
To: <robh@...nel.org>
CC: <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, <lee@...nel.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>,
<alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, <Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com>,
<richard.genoud@...il.com>, <radu_nicolae.pirea@....ro>,
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <broonie@...nel.org>,
<mturquette@...libre.com>, <sboyd@...nel.org>,
<jirislaby@...nel.org>, <admin@...iphile.com>,
<Kavyasree.Kotagiri@...rochip.com>, <Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/13] dt-bindings: serial: atmel,at91-usart: Add
SAM9260 compatibles to SAM9x60
On 09.09.2022 04:36, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 03:15:44PM +0000, Sergiu.Moga@...rochip.com wrote:
>> On 08.09.2022 15:30, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 06/09/2022 15:55, Sergiu Moga wrote:
>>>> Add the AT91SAM9260 serial compatibles to the list of SAM9X60 compatibles
>>>> in order to highlight the incremental characteristics of the SAM9X60
>>>> serial IP.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sergiu Moga <sergiu.moga@...rochip.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> v1 -> v2:
>>>> - Nothing, this patch was not here before
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/atmel,at91-usart.yaml | 2 ++
>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/atmel,at91-usart.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/atmel,at91-usart.yaml
>>>> index b25535b7a4d2..4d80006963c7 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/atmel,at91-usart.yaml
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/atmel,at91-usart.yaml
>>>> @@ -26,6 +26,8 @@ properties:
>>>> - items:
>>>> - const: microchip,sam9x60-dbgu
>>>> - const: microchip,sam9x60-usart
>>>> + - const: atmel,at91sam9260-dbgu
>>>> + - const: atmel,at91sam9260-usart
>>>
>>> This is weird. You say in commit msg to "highlight the incremental
>>> characteristics" but you basically change here existing compatibles.
>>
>>
>> Does "show that they are incremental IP's" sound better then?
>>
>>
>>> This is not enum, but a list.
>>>
>>
>>
>> What do you mean by this? I know it is a list, I specified so in the
>> commit message.
>
> You are saying that compatible must be exactly the 4 strings above in
> the order listed. You need another entry with another 'items' list.
>
> Rob
That is what was intended though: a list of the 4 compatibles in that
exact order. The 4th patch of this series also ensures that all 9x60
nodes have that exact list of 4 compatibles.
Regards,
Sergiu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists