[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220912100535.18125-1-xu.panda@zte.com.cn>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 10:05:36 +0000
From: cgel.zte@...il.com
To: casey@...aufler-ca.com
Cc: paul@...l-moore.com, jmorris@...ei.org, serge@...lyn.com,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Xu Panda <xu.panda@....com.cn>,
Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: [PATCH linux-next] smack: lsm: remove the unneeded result variable
From: Xu Panda <xu.panda@....com.cn>
Return the value smk_ptrace_rule_check() directly instead of storing it
in another redundant variable.
Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Xu Panda <xu.panda@....com.cn>
---
security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
index 16e24a6cdc7c..b6306d71c908 100644
--- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
+++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
@@ -497,13 +497,11 @@ static int smack_ptrace_access_check(struct task_struct *ctp, unsigned int mode)
*/
static int smack_ptrace_traceme(struct task_struct *ptp)
{
- int rc;
struct smack_known *skp;
skp = smk_of_task(smack_cred(current_cred()));
- rc = smk_ptrace_rule_check(ptp, skp, PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH, __func__);
- return rc;
+ return smk_ptrace_rule_check(ptp, skp, PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH, __func__);
}
/**
--
2.15.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists