[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=WrH2AAFxV72FZqk-=xU8jzCn6KtcbZRYJAaCwhmvSWmg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 15:29:52 +0100
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>
Cc: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chris Morgan <macromorgan@...mail.com>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] Revert "drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Implement bridge
connector operations for DP"
Robert,
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 12:43 PM Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> As reported by Laurent in response to this commit[1], this functionality should
> not be implemented using the devicetree, because of this let's revert this series
> for now.
>
> This reverts commit c312b0df3b13e4c533743bb2c37fd1bc237368e5.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220902153906.31000-2-macroalpha82@gmail.com/
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 28 ---------------------------
> 1 file changed, 28 deletions(-)
Any chance you got confused and reverted the wrong patch? This
ti-sn65dsi86 patch doesn't seem relevant to the problems talked about
in the commit or the cover letter. Maybe I'm missing something?
-Doug
Powered by blists - more mailing lists