lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220913140418.051956814@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 13 Sep 2022 16:04:27 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
        Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.19 161/192] Smack: Provide read control for io_uring_cmd

From: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>

commit dd9373402280cf4715fdc8fd5070f7d039e43511 upstream.

Limit io_uring "cmd" options to files for which the caller has
Smack read access. There may be cases where the cmd option may
be closer to a write access than a read, but there is no way
to make that determination.

Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Fixes: ee692a21e9bf ("fs,io_uring: add infrastructure for uring-cmd")
Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 security/smack/smack_lsm.c |   32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)

--- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
+++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
 #include <linux/fs_context.h>
 #include <linux/fs_parser.h>
 #include <linux/watch_queue.h>
+#include <linux/io_uring.h>
 #include "smack.h"
 
 #define TRANS_TRUE	"TRUE"
@@ -4739,6 +4740,36 @@ static int smack_uring_sqpoll(void)
 	return -EPERM;
 }
 
+/**
+ * smack_uring_cmd - check on file operations for io_uring
+ * @ioucmd: the command in question
+ *
+ * Make a best guess about whether a io_uring "command" should
+ * be allowed. Use the same logic used for determining if the
+ * file could be opened for read in the absence of better criteria.
+ */
+static int smack_uring_cmd(struct io_uring_cmd *ioucmd)
+{
+	struct file *file = ioucmd->file;
+	struct smk_audit_info ad;
+	struct task_smack *tsp;
+	struct inode *inode;
+	int rc;
+
+	if (!file)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	tsp = smack_cred(file->f_cred);
+	inode = file_inode(file);
+
+	smk_ad_init(&ad, __func__, LSM_AUDIT_DATA_PATH);
+	smk_ad_setfield_u_fs_path(&ad, file->f_path);
+	rc = smk_tskacc(tsp, smk_of_inode(inode), MAY_READ, &ad);
+	rc = smk_bu_credfile(file->f_cred, file, MAY_READ, rc);
+
+	return rc;
+}
+
 #endif /* CONFIG_IO_URING */
 
 struct lsm_blob_sizes smack_blob_sizes __lsm_ro_after_init = {
@@ -4896,6 +4927,7 @@ static struct security_hook_list smack_h
 #ifdef CONFIG_IO_URING
 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(uring_override_creds, smack_uring_override_creds),
 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(uring_sqpoll, smack_uring_sqpoll),
+	LSM_HOOK_INIT(uring_cmd, smack_uring_cmd),
 #endif
 };
 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ