linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 2/5] erofs: introduce fscache-based domain

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 14 Sep 2022 11:02:21 +0800
From:   JeffleXu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     Jia Zhu <zhujia.zj@...edance.com>, linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        xiang@...nel.org, chao@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        yinxin.x@...edance.com, huyue2@...lpad.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/5] erofs: introduce fscache-based domain



On 9/2/22 6:53 PM, Jia Zhu wrote:

>  int erofs_fscache_register_cookie(struct super_block *sb,
>  				  struct erofs_fscache **fscache,
>  				  char *name, bool need_inode)
> @@ -495,7 +581,8 @@ int erofs_fscache_register_fs(struct super_block *sb)
>  	char *name;
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
> -	name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "erofs,%s", sbi->opt.fsid);
> +	name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "erofs,%s",
> +			sbi->domain ? sbi->domain->domain_id : sbi->opt.fsid);
>  	if (!name)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  

What if domain_id and fsid has the same value?

How about the format "erofs,<domain_id>,<fsid>"? While in the
non-share-domain mode, is the format like "erofs,,<fsid>" or the default
"erofs,<fsid>"?


-- 
Thanks,
Jingbo