[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56b0a8c1-94ce-3219-6b43-d91d2e0e85b5@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 11:02:21 +0800
From: JeffleXu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Jia Zhu <zhujia.zj@...edance.com>, linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org,
xiang@...nel.org, chao@...nel.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
yinxin.x@...edance.com, huyue2@...lpad.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/5] erofs: introduce fscache-based domain
On 9/2/22 6:53 PM, Jia Zhu wrote:
> int erofs_fscache_register_cookie(struct super_block *sb,
> struct erofs_fscache **fscache,
> char *name, bool need_inode)
> @@ -495,7 +581,8 @@ int erofs_fscache_register_fs(struct super_block *sb)
> char *name;
> int ret = 0;
>
> - name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "erofs,%s", sbi->opt.fsid);
> + name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "erofs,%s",
> + sbi->domain ? sbi->domain->domain_id : sbi->opt.fsid);
> if (!name)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
What if domain_id and fsid has the same value?
How about the format "erofs,<domain_id>,<fsid>"? While in the
non-share-domain mode, is the format like "erofs,,<fsid>" or the default
"erofs,<fsid>"?
--
Thanks,
Jingbo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists