lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 14 Sep 2022 11:15:39 +0800
From:   Jia Zhu <zhujia.zj@...edance.com>
To:     JeffleXu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, xiang@...nel.org, chao@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        yinxin.x@...edance.com, huyue2@...lpad.com
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH V2 2/5] erofs: introduce fscache-based
 domain



在 2022/9/14 11:02, JeffleXu 写道:
> 
> 
> On 9/2/22 6:53 PM, Jia Zhu wrote:
> 
>>   int erofs_fscache_register_cookie(struct super_block *sb,
>>   				  struct erofs_fscache **fscache,
>>   				  char *name, bool need_inode)
>> @@ -495,7 +581,8 @@ int erofs_fscache_register_fs(struct super_block *sb)
>>   	char *name;
>>   	int ret = 0;
>>   
>> -	name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "erofs,%s", sbi->opt.fsid);
>> +	name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "erofs,%s",
>> +			sbi->domain ? sbi->domain->domain_id : sbi->opt.fsid);
>>   	if (!name)
>>   		return -ENOMEM;
>>   
> 
> What if domain_id and fsid has the same value?
> 
> How about the format "erofs,<domain_id>,<fsid>"? While in the
> non-share-domain mode, is the format like "erofs,,<fsid>" or the default
> "erofs,<fsid>"?
> 
Thanks for pointing this out. I'll revise it.
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ