[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220914060147.1934064-1-mcgrof@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 23:01:45 -0700
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: tglx@...utronix.de, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org
Cc: joe@...ches.com, mcgrof@...nel.org, keescook@...omium.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, linux-spdx@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v10 0/2] SPDX: add copyleft-next-0.3.1
As suggested by Thomas Gleixner, I'm following up to move on with
the SPDX tag needed for copyleft-next-0.3.1. I've split this out
from the test_sysfs selftest so to separate review from that.
Changes on this v10:
o embraced paragraph from Thomas Gleixner which helps explain why
the OR operator in the SPDX license name
o dropped the GPL-2.0 and GPL-2.0+ tags as suggested by Thomas Gleixner
as these are outdated (still valid) in the SPDX spec
o trimmed the Cc list to remove the test_sysfs / block layer / fs folks as
the test_sysfs stuff is now dropped from consideration in this series
The last series was at v9 but it also had the test_sysfs and its
changes, its history can be found here:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211029184500.2821444-1-mcgrof@kernel.org/
Luis Chamberlain (2):
LICENSES: Add the copyleft-next-0.3.1 license
testing: use the copyleft-next-0.3.1 SPDX tag
LICENSES/dual/copyleft-next-0.3.1 | 236 +++++++++++++++++++++++
lib/test_kmod.c | 12 +-
lib/test_sysctl.c | 12 +-
tools/testing/selftests/kmod/kmod.sh | 13 +-
tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/sysctl.sh | 12 +-
5 files changed, 240 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 LICENSES/dual/copyleft-next-0.3.1
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists