| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 15:19:33 +0200
From: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc: mchehab@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, vkoul@...nel.org, kishon@...com,
sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com, hverkuil@...all.nl,
jacopo@...ndi.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] media: dt-bindings: add bindings for Toshiba TC358746
Hi Laurent,
On 22-09-05, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Marco,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 04:33:06PM +0200, Marco Felsch wrote:
> > Add the bindings for the Toshiba TC358746 Parallel <-> MIPI-CSI bridge
> > driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>
> > ---
> > .../bindings/media/i2c/toshiba,tc358746.yaml | 157 ++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 157 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/toshiba,tc358746.yaml
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/toshiba,tc358746.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/toshiba,tc358746.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..9783cca363c6
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/toshiba,tc358746.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,157 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/media/i2c/toshiba,tc358746.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: Toshiba TC358746 Parallel to MIPI CSI2 Bridge
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > + - Marco Felsch <kernel@...gutronix.de>
> > +
> > +description: |-
> > + The Toshiba TC358746 converts a parallel video stream into a MIPI CSI-2
> > + stream. The direction can be either parallel-in -> csi-out or csi-in ->
> > + parallel-out The chip is programmable trough I2C and SPI but the SPI
> > + interface is only supported in parallel-in -> csi-out mode.
> > +
> > + Note that the current device tree bindings only support the
> > + parallel-in -> csi-out path.
> > +
> > +properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + const: toshiba,tc358746
> > +
> > + reg:
> > + maxItems: 1
> > +
> > + clocks:
> > + description:
> > + The phandle to the reference clock source. This corresponds to the
> > + hardware pin REFCLK.
> > + maxItems: 1
> > +
> > + clock-names:
> > + const: refclk
>
> As there's a single clock, should we omit the clock name ?
Don't know, I would rather keep it to make it explicite. Many other go
that way too.
> > +# The bridge can act as clock provider for the sensor. To enable this support
> > +# #clock-cells must be specified. Attention if this feature is used than the
>
> s/than/then/
Sure, thanks.
>
> > +# mclk rate must be at least: (2 * link-frequency) / 8
> > +# `------------------ยด ^
> > +# internal PLL rate smallest possible mclk-div
>
> Could this be captured in the description of the property instead of a
> comment ?
Hm.. a few (1,2) bindings using comments like this but I'm not against
it. If it belongs to the description, which property should I use? Since
there is no: clock-controller property like gpio-controller or
interrupt-controller. The clock provider will be activated based on the
#clock-cells property. But this property has nothing to with the
description since this property specifies the cell size.
> > + "#clock-cells":
> > + const: 0
> > +
> > + clock-output-names:
> > + description:
> > + The clock name of the MCLK output, the default name is tc358746-mclk.
> > + maxItems: 1
> > +
> > + vddc-supply:
> > + description: Digital core voltage supply, 1.2 volts
> > +
> > + vddio-supply:
> > + description: Digital I/O voltage supply, 1.8 volts
> > +
> > + vddmipi-supply:
> > + description: MIPI CSI phy voltage supply, 1.2 volts
> > +
> > + reset-gpios:
> > + description:
> > + The phandle and specifier for the GPIO that controls the chip reset.
> > + This corresponds to the hardware pin RESX which is physically active low.
> > + maxItems: 1
> > +
> > + ports:
> > + $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/ports
> > + properties:
> > + port@0:
> > + $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/port
> > + description: Input port
>
> Are the H/V sync signal polarities fixed, or should they be specified
> here ?
At the moment they are fixed. I can describe it if you want.
> Does the chip support external sync only, or also BT.656 ? In the
> latter case this needs a bus-type.
Yes, the chip also supports BT.656 but the driver doesn't support it
yet. You're right, that we should make it explicite albeit it would a
bit overhead yet since the only mode is: parallel-in with externa syncs.
> > +
> > + port@1:
> > + $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/$defs/port-base
> > + description: Output port
> > +
> > + properties:
> > + endpoint:
> > + $ref: /schemas/media/video-interfaces.yaml#
> > + unevaluatedProperties: false
> > +
> > + properties:
> > + data-lanes:
> > + minItems: 1
> > + maxItems: 4
> > +
> > + clock-noncontinuous: true
> > + link-frequencies: true
> > +
> > + required:
> > + - data-lanes
> > + - link-frequencies
> > +
> > + required:
> > + - port@0
> > + - port@1
> > +
> > +required:
> > + - compatible
> > + - reg
> > + - clocks
> > + - clock-names
> > + - vddc-supply
> > + - vddio-supply
> > + - vddmipi-supply
> > + - ports
> > +
> > +additionalProperties: false
> > +
> > +examples:
> > + - |
> > + #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
> > +
> > + i2c {
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > +
> > + csi-bridge@e {
> > + compatible = "toshiba,tc358746";
> > + reg = <0xe>;
> > +
> > + clocks = <&refclk>;
> > + clock-names = "refclk";
> > +
> > + reset-gpios = <&gpio 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> > +
> > + vddc-supply = <&v1_2d>;
> > + vddio-supply = <&v1_8d>;
> > + vddmipi-supply = <&v1_2d>;
> > +
> > + /* sensor mclk provider */
> > + #clock-cells = <0>;
> > +
> > + ports {
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > +
> > + /* Input */
> > + port@0 {
> > + reg = <0>;
> > + tc358746_in: endpoint {
> > + remote-endpoint = <&sensor_out>;
> > + };
>
> Wrong indentation here.
Yes, thanks.
Regards,
Marco
> > + };
> > +
> > + /* Output */
> > + port@1 {
> > + reg = <1>;
> > + tc358746_out: endpoint {
> > + remote-endpoint = <&mipi_csi2_in>;
> > + data-lanes = <1 2>;
> > + clock-noncontinuous;
> > + link-frequencies = /bits/ 64 <216000000>;
> > + };
> > + };
> > + };
> > + };
> > + };
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Pinchart
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists