[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM7w-FV8Vn_jUz1ExA5HHVz66sDzYw4vZw9EoxCHuGh_Fm3YiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 10:24:58 -0400
From: Sven van Ashbrook <svenva@...omium.org>
To: Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Olivia Mackall <olivia@...enic.com>,
Alex Levin <levinale@...gle.com>,
Andrey Pronin <apronin@...gle.com>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...gle.com>,
Rajat Jain <rajatja@...gle.com>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] random: move add_hwgenerator_randomness()'s wait
outside function
Hi Dominik,
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 2:24 AM Dominik Brodowski
<linux@...inikbrodowski.net> wrote:
>
> Indeed, our patches address different issues. I'm fine with both approaches,
> i.e. my patches to be based on Sven's, or the other way round.
Sounds good! May I suggest then that you try to rebase your patch on top of
mine. With a bit of luck, it will become simpler, with fewer kthread related
footguns. I am available to help review.
If your patch becomes more complicated however, we'll work the other way
around.
How does that sound?
Sven
Powered by blists - more mailing lists