lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 16 Sep 2022 11:01:08 +0800
From:   Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, <x86@...nel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <paulmck@...nel.org>, <rui.zhang@...el.com>, <len.brown@...el.com>,
        <tim.c.chen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] x86/tsc: Add option to force frequency recalibration
 with HW timer

Hi Thomas, Peter,

You've helped reviewing the earlier version and improving the patch
description, and do you see any other places I need to improve? thanks!

- Feng

On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 03:40:18PM +0800, Feng Tang wrote:
> The kernel assumes that the TSC frequency which is provided by the
> hardware / firmware via MSRs or CPUID(0x15) is correct after applying
> a few basic consistency checks. This disables the TSC recalibration
> against HPET or PM timer.
> 
> As a result there is no mechanism to validate that frequency in cases
> where a firmware or hardware defect is suspected. And there was case
> that some user used atomic clock to measure the TSC frequency and
> reported an inaccuracy issue, which was later fixed in firmware.
> 
> Add an option 'recalibrate' for 'tsc' kernel parameter to force the
> tsc freq recalibration with HPET or PM timer, and warn if the deviation
> from previous value is more than about 500 PPM, which provides a way 
> to verify the data from hardware / firmware.
> 
> There is no functional change to existing work flow.
> 
> [Thanks tglx for helping improving the commit log] 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
> ---
> Changelog:
> 
>   since v3:
>     * add some real world case into commit log
>     * rebase against v6.0-rc1
> 
>   since v2:
>     * revise the option description in kernel-parameters.txt
>     * rebase against v5.19-rc2
> 
>   since v1:
>     * refine commit log to state clearly the problem and intention
>       of the patch by copying Thomas' words.
> 
>  .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt         |  4 +++
>  arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c                         | 34 ++++++++++++++++---
>  2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> index d7f30902fda0..4924256592d9 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -6302,6 +6302,10 @@
>  			in situations with strict latency requirements (where
>  			interruptions from clocksource watchdog are not
>  			acceptable).
> +			[x86] recalibrate: force to do frequency recalibration
> +			with a HW timer (HPET or PM timer) for systems whose
> +			TSC frequency comes from HW or FW through MSR or CPUID(0x15),
> +			and warn if the difference is more than 500 ppm.
>  
>  	tsc_early_khz=  [X86] Skip early TSC calibration and use the given
>  			value instead. Useful when the early TSC frequency discovery
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> index cafacb2e58cc..5cf62a58754a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> @@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(__use_tsc);
>  
>  int tsc_clocksource_reliable;
>  
> +static int __read_mostly tsc_force_recalibrate;
> +
>  static u32 art_to_tsc_numerator;
>  static u32 art_to_tsc_denominator;
>  static u64 art_to_tsc_offset;
> @@ -303,6 +305,8 @@ static int __init tsc_setup(char *str)
>  		mark_tsc_unstable("boot parameter");
>  	if (!strcmp(str, "nowatchdog"))
>  		no_tsc_watchdog = 1;
> +	if (!strcmp(str, "recalibrate"))
> +		tsc_force_recalibrate = 1;
>  	return 1;
>  }
>  
> @@ -1374,6 +1378,25 @@ static void tsc_refine_calibration_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  	else
>  		freq = calc_pmtimer_ref(delta, ref_start, ref_stop);
>  
> +	/* Will hit this only if tsc_force_recalibrate has been set */
> +	if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TSC_KNOWN_FREQ)) {
> +
> +		/* Warn if the deviation exceeds 500 ppm */
> +		if (abs(tsc_khz - freq) > (tsc_khz >> 11)) {
> +			pr_warn("Warning: TSC freq calibrated by CPUID/MSR differs from what is calibrated by HW timer, please check with vendor!!\n");
> +			pr_info("Previous calibrated TSC freq:\t %lu.%03lu MHz\n",
> +				(unsigned long)tsc_khz / 1000,
> +				(unsigned long)tsc_khz % 1000);
> +		}
> +
> +		pr_info("TSC freq recalibrated by [%s]:\t %lu.%03lu MHz\n",
> +			hpet ? "HPET" : "PM_TIMER",
> +			(unsigned long)freq / 1000,
> +			(unsigned long)freq % 1000);
> +
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
>  	/* Make sure we're within 1% */
>  	if (abs(tsc_khz - freq) > tsc_khz/100)
>  		goto out;
> @@ -1407,8 +1430,10 @@ static int __init init_tsc_clocksource(void)
>  	if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TSC) || !tsc_khz)
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	if (tsc_unstable)
> -		goto unreg;
> +	if (tsc_unstable) {
> +		clocksource_unregister(&clocksource_tsc_early);
> +		return 0;
> +	}
>  
>  	if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC_S3))
>  		clocksource_tsc.flags |= CLOCK_SOURCE_SUSPEND_NONSTOP;
> @@ -1421,9 +1446,10 @@ static int __init init_tsc_clocksource(void)
>  		if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ART))
>  			art_related_clocksource = &clocksource_tsc;
>  		clocksource_register_khz(&clocksource_tsc, tsc_khz);
> -unreg:
>  		clocksource_unregister(&clocksource_tsc_early);
> -		return 0;
> +
> +		if (!tsc_force_recalibrate)
> +			return 0;
>  	}
>  
>  	schedule_delayed_work(&tsc_irqwork, 0);
> -- 
> 2.27.0
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ