[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220916031149.6140-1-liujing@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 23:11:49 -0400
From: liujing <liujing@...s.chinamobile.com>
To: clm@...com, josef@...icpanda.com, dsterba@...e.com
Cc: linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
liujing <liujing@...s.chinamobile.com>
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: fixed an incorrect variable assignment
In the btrfs_reclaim_bgs_work function,
there is an assignment of int ret =0,
but this assignment is not used in the following code,
so it can be defined as int ret.
Signed-off-by: liujing <liujing@...s.chinamobile.com>
---
fs/btrfs/block-group.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
index c52b6e245b9a..a4c7fb423244 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
@@ -1571,7 +1571,7 @@ void btrfs_reclaim_bgs_work(struct work_struct *work)
list_sort(NULL, &fs_info->reclaim_bgs, reclaim_bgs_cmp);
while (!list_empty(&fs_info->reclaim_bgs)) {
u64 zone_unusable;
- int ret = 0;
+ int ret;
bg = list_first_entry(&fs_info->reclaim_bgs,
struct btrfs_block_group,
--
2.18.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists