lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 7 Oct 2022 18:42:49 +0200
From:   David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
To:     liujing <liujing@...s.chinamobile.com>
Cc:     clm@...com, josef@...icpanda.com, dsterba@...e.com,
        linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: fixed an incorrect variable assignment

On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 11:11:49PM -0400, liujing wrote:
> In the btrfs_reclaim_bgs_work function, 
> there is an assignment of int ret =0, 
> but this assignment is not used in the following code, 
> so it can be defined as int ret.
> 
> Signed-off-by: liujing <liujing@...s.chinamobile.com>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/block-group.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
> index c52b6e245b9a..a4c7fb423244 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
> @@ -1571,7 +1571,7 @@ void btrfs_reclaim_bgs_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  	list_sort(NULL, &fs_info->reclaim_bgs, reclaim_bgs_cmp);
>  	while (!list_empty(&fs_info->reclaim_bgs)) {
>  		u64 zone_unusable;
> -		int ret = 0;
> +		int ret;

I'm not sure we need to fix that, is it fixing some warning? Also please
rephrase the subject, it's not 'incorrect', the code works as expected
but the initial value is not used.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ