[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YyVmYXGCfTuYUsNb@intel.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2022 09:17:05 +0300
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>
To: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Cc: "Yadav, Arvind" <arvyadav@....com>,
Arvind Yadav <Arvind.Yadav@....com>, andrey.grodzovsky@....com,
shashank.sharma@....com, amaranath.somalapuram@....com,
Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@....com, sumit.semwal@...aro.org,
gustavo@...ovan.org, airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] dma-buf: Check status of enable-signaling bit on
debug
On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 06:05:30PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Am 15.09.22 um 15:02 schrieb Yadav, Arvind:
> >
> > On 9/15/2022 5:37 PM, Christian König wrote:
> >> Is that sufficient to allow running a desktop on amdgpu with the
> >> extra check enabled? If yes that would be quite a milestone.
> >>
> > Yes, It is running on amdgpu with extra config enabled.
>
> In this case I will start pushing the patches to drm-misc-next. I'm just
> going to leave out the last one until the IGT tests are working as well.
ffs Christian. intel CI blew up yet again:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12146/shard-glk7/igt@kms_plane_lowres@tiling-y@pipe-c-hdmi-a-2.html
The last time (some ttm thing) was just a week or two ago,
so it's really getting tiresome watching you push entirely
untested stuff all the time. Would be really helpful if you
finally started to do/require premerge testing.
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists