linux-kernel - Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] dma-buf: Check status of enable-signaling bit on debug

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c958d871-9a89-3490-f5e3-3a2441926074@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 17 Sep 2022 17:18:40 +0200
From:   Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@...il.com>
To:     Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Cc:     "Yadav, Arvind" <arvyadav@....com>,
        Arvind Yadav <Arvind.Yadav@....com>, andrey.grodzovsky@....com,
        shashank.sharma@....com, amaranath.somalapuram@....com,
        Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@....com, sumit.semwal@...aro.org,
        gustavo@...ovan.org, airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] dma-buf: Check status of
 enable-signaling bit on debug

Am 17.09.22 um 08:17 schrieb Ville Syrjälä:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 06:05:30PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
>> Am 15.09.22 um 15:02 schrieb Yadav, Arvind:
>>> On 9/15/2022 5:37 PM, Christian König wrote:
>>>> Is that sufficient to allow running a desktop on amdgpu with the
>>>> extra check enabled? If yes that would be quite a milestone.
>>>>
>>> Yes, It is running on amdgpu with extra config enabled.
>> In this case I will start pushing the patches to drm-misc-next. I'm just
>> going to leave out the last one until the IGT tests are working as well.
> ffs Christian. intel CI blew up yet again:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12146/shard-glk7/igt@kms_plane_lowres@tiling-y@pipe-c-hdmi-a-2.html
>
> The last time (some ttm thing) was just a week or two ago,
> so it's really getting tiresome watching you push entirely
> untested stuff all the time. Would be really helpful if you
> finally started to do/require premerge testing.

Well first of all sorry for causing trouble, but as I wrote above I 
intentionally left out the last one to *not* break the IGT tests.

The patches pushed so far where just updating a bunch of corner cases 
and fixing the selftests.

Do you have any more insight why that should affect the IGT tests?

Regards,
Christian.